Cited by 36Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Intra-subject reliability of the high-resolution whole-brain structural connectome

Besson, Pierre, Lopes, Renaud, Leclerc, Xavier, Derambure, Philippe, Tyvaert, Louise·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Recent advances in diffusion weighted image acquisition and processing allow for the construction of anatomically highly precise structural connectomes. In this study, we introduce a method to compute high-resolution whole-brain structural connectome. Our method relies on cortical and subcortical triangulated surface models, and on a large number of fiber tracts generated using a probabilistic tractography algorithm. Each surface triangle is a node of the structural connectivity graph while edges are fiber tract densities across pairs of nodes. Surface-based registration and downsampling to a common surface space are introduced for group analysis whereas connectome surface smoothing aimed at improving whole-brain network estimate reliability. Based on 10 datasets acquired from a single healthy subject, we evaluated the effects of repeated probabilistic tractography, surface smoothing, surface registration and downsampling to the common surface space. We show that, provided enough fiber tracts and surface smoothing, good to excellent intra-acquisition reliability could be achieved. Surface registration and downsampling efficiently established triangle-to-triangle correspondence across acquisitions and high inter-acquisition reliability was obtained. Computational time and disk/memory usages were monitored throughout the steps. Although further testing on large cohort of subjects is required, our method presents the potential to accurately model whole-brain structural connectiv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various parcellation scales have been applied in different studies, ranging from tens to millions of white matter parcels.

    “Various parcellation scales have been applied in different studies, ranging from tens to millions of white matter parcels (Besson et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Osmanlıoğlu et al., 2020; Rodrigues et al., 2013; Zalesky et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2018a).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Besson, P., Lopes, R., Leclerc, X., Derambure, P., & Tyvaert, L.
Affiliations
Université de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Besson, Pierre
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
102
Pages
283-293
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083442387
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
structural connectome, probabilistic tractography, surface registration, surface smoothing, triangulated surface models, whole-brain networks, diffusion MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review