Age-related changes in reappraisal of appetitive cravings during adolescence
Open accessAbstract
The ability to regulate temptation and manage appetitive cravings is an important aspect of healthy adolescent development, but the neural systems underlying this process are understudied. In the present study, 60 healthy females evenly distributed from 10 to 23years of age used reappraisal to regulate the desire to consume personally-craved and not craved unhealthy foods. Reappraisal elicited activity in common self-regulation regions including the dorsal and ventral lateral prefrontal cortex (specifically superior and inferior frontal gyri), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and inferior parietal lobule. Viewing personally-craved foods (versus not craved foods) elicited activity in regions including the ventral striatum, as well as more rostral and ventral anterior cingulate cortex extending into the orbitofrontal cortex. Age positively correlated with regulation-related activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus, and negatively correlated with reactivity-related activity in the right superior and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Age-adjusted BMI negatively correlated with regulation-related activity in the predominantly left lateralized frontal and parietal regions. These results suggest that the age-related changes seen in the reappraisal of negative emotion may not be as pronounced in the reappraisal of food craving. Therefore, reappraisal of food craving in particular may be an effective way to teach teenagers to manage cravings for other temptations encountered in adolescence, including alcohol, drugs, and unhealthy food.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In contrast to regulating negative emotions, key developmental differences in appetitive food regulation were in baseline craving rather than skill in reappraising.
“Interestingly, and in contrast to studies of regulating negative emotions, the key developmental differences were found in the degree to which children and adolescents craved the foods at baseline as compared to adults, rather than their skill in reappraising.”
From The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Application of reappraisal strategies led to decreased craving for rewarding foods and decreased activation in ventral striatum.
“in one reward domain - appetitive reactivity to foods -several studies found that application of reappraisal strategies led to decreased craving for rewarding foods and decreased activation in ventral striatum”
From The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
The decreased craving and activation from reappraisal improved linearly with age.
“and this decreased craving and activation improved linearly with age [39,40].”
From The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 52
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Giuliani NR Gross JJ Sander D Scherer KR Reappraisal Oxford Companion to the Affective Sciences 2009 New York, NY Oxford University Press
- Authors
- Giuliani, N. R., & Pfeifer, J. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Giuliani, Nicole R.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 108
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4817999
- OpenAlex
- W2071142468
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Oregon Medical Research Foundation
- NIDA, U.S. PHS (P50 DA035763)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- cognitive reappraisal, food cravings, adolescent development, brain aging, self-regulation, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, ventral striatum, body mass index, unhealthy food, emotion regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Appetite, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Craving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review