Oxytocin reduces neural activity in the pain circuitry when seeing pain in others
Open accessAbstract
Our empathetic abilities allow us to feel the pain of others. This phenomenon of vicarious feeling arises because the neural circuitry of feeling pain and seeing pain in others is shared. The neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) is considered a robust facilitator of empathy, as intranasal OXT studies have repeatedly been shown to improve cognitive empathy (e.g. mind reading and emotion recognition). However, OXT has not yet been shown to increase neural empathic responses to pain in others, a core aspect of affective empathy. Effects of OXT on empathy for pain are difficult to predict, because OXT evidently has pain-reducing properties. Accordingly, OXT might paradoxically decrease empathy for pain. Here, using functional neuroimaging we show robust activation in the neural circuitry of pain (insula and sensorimotor regions) when subjects observe pain in others. Crucially, this empathy-related activation in the neural circuitry of pain is strongly reduced after intranasal OXT, specifically in the left insula. OXT on the basis of our neuroimaging data thus remarkably decreases empathy for pain, but further research including behavioral measures is necessary to draw definite conclusions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is little neuroimaging work in females focusing on oxytocin and its influence on neural systems for pain processing.
“To our knowledge, there is little neuroimaging work in females focusing on oxytocin and its influence on neural systems for pain processing, as most published work is exclusively on males and/or is focused on empathy for pain.54, 55, 56, 57”
From Intranasal oxytocin enhances intrinsic corticostriatal functional connectivity in women (2017) · cites this paper as [55]
Bos et al. (2015) found oxytocin strongly reduced pain-related neural activation, suggesting oxytocin might reduce empathy for pain.
“a recent study found that empathy-related activation in the neural circuitry of pain was strongly reduced after intranasal OXT, suggesting that OXT might decrease empathy for pain (Bos, Montoya, Hermans, Keysers, & van Honk, 2015).”
From Oxytocin increases attention to the eyes and selectively enhances self-reported affective empathy for fear (2017) · cites this paper as Bos, Montoya, Hermans, Keysers, & van Honk, 2015
Previous studies examining empathy for others' physical pain in men without ASD show reduced activation in the left insula after oxytocin administration.
“Further, our result of increased amygdala activation is not in line with previous studies examining empathy for others’ physical pain in men without ASD, showing reduced activation in the left insula after oxytocin administration84.”
From Randomized clinical trial shows no substantial modulation of empathy-related neural activation by intranasal oxytocin in autism (2021) · cites this paper as [84]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Bos, P. A., Montoya, E. R., Hermans, E. J., Keysers, C., & van Honk, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bos, Peter A.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 217-224
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4562366
- OpenAlex
- W2014530731
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 15.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.knaw.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (MEXT-CT-2005-023253, 312511)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- oxytocin, empathy for pain, vicarious pain, affective empathy, insula, sensorimotor cortex, intranasal administration, pain observation, cognitive empathy
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Empathy, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Oxytocin, Pain, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Neuroimaging, Sensorimotor Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review