Cortical maturation and myelination in healthy toddlers and young children
Open accessAbstract
The maturation of cortical structures, and the establishment of their connectivity, are critical neurodevelopmental processes that support and enable cognitive and behavioral functioning. Measures of cortical development, including thickness, curvature, and gyrification have been extensively studied in older children, adolescents, and adults, revealing regional associations with cognitive performance, and alterations with disease or pathology. In addition to these gross morphometric measures, increased attention has recently focused on quantifying more specific indices of cortical structure, in particular intracortical myelination, and their relationship to cognitive skills, including IQ, executive functioning, and language performance. Here we analyze the progression of cortical myelination across early childhood, from 1 to 6 years of age, in vivo for the first time. Using two quantitative imaging techniques, namely T1 relaxation time and myelin water fraction (MWF) imaging, we characterize myelination throughout the cortex, examine developmental trends, and investigate hemispheric and gender-based differences. We present a pattern of cortical myelination that broadly mirrors established histological timelines, with somatosensory, motor and visual cortices myelinating by 1 year of age; and frontal and temporal cortices exhibiting more protracted myelination. Developmental trajectories, defined by logarithmic functions (increasing for MWF, decreasing for T1), were characterized for each of 68 cortical regions. Comparisons of trajectories between hemispheres and gender revealed no significant differences. Results illustrate the ability to quantitatively map cortical myelination throughout early neurodevelopment, and may provide an important new tool for investigating typical and atypical development.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A custom template previously developed by the group was used for Freesurfer segmentation of the age range of the current sample to ensure accurate cortical segmentation.
“To ensure accurate cortical segmentation we used a custom template that our group has previously developed for Freesurfer segmentation of the age range of the current sample (Croteau-Chonka et al., 2016; Deoni et al., 2015)”
From Quantifying cortical development in typically developing toddlers and young children, 1–6 years of age (2017) · cites this paper as Deoni et al., 2015
Prior research from our group has successfully demonstrated using Freesurfer cortical reconstruction to generate a cortical ribbon from a single (IR-SPGR) contrast acquisition for analysis of cortical myelin and thickness development between ages 1 and 6.
“Prior research from our group has successfully demonstrated using Freesurfer cortical reconstruction to generate a cortical ribbon from a single (IR-SPGR) contrast acquisition for analysis of cortical myelin and thickness development between ages 1 and 6 (Croteau-Chonka et al., 2016, Deoni et al., 2015).”
From Quantifying cortical development in typically developing toddlers and young children, 1–6 years of age (2017) · cites this paper as Deoni et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 221
- Authors
- Deoni, S. C. L., Dean, D. C., Remer, J., Dirks, H., & O’Muircheartaigh, J.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Deoni, Sean C.L.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 147-161
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4463864
- OpenAlex
- W2010917685
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Mental Health (R01 MH087510)
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (PN 151325)
- Wellcome Trust (096195)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development under the National Institutes of Health (T32HD007489, P30HD003352)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Keywords
- cortical myelination, cortical maturation, early childhood neurodevelopment, myelin water fraction, T1 relaxation time, hemispheric lateralization, sex differences, somatosensory cortex, motor cortex, visual cortex, frontal cortex, temporal cortex, cortical thickness, cortical curvature, cortical folding
- MeSH terms
- Body Water, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Infant, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Cortex, Myelin Sheath, Sex Characteristics, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review