Cited by 166Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Estimation of dynamic functional connectivity using multiplication of temporal derivatives

Shine, James M., Koyejo, Oluwasanmi, Bell, Peter T., Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J., Gilat, Moran, Poldrack, Russell A.·2015·NeuroImage

Abstract

Functional connectivity provides an informative and powerful framework for exploring brain organization. Despite this, few statistical methods are available for the accurate estimation of dynamic changes in functional network architecture. To date, the majority of existing statistical techniques have assumed that connectivity structure is stationary, which is in direct contrast to emerging data that suggests that the strength of connectivity between regions is variable over time. Therefore, the development of statistical methods that enable exploration of dynamic changes in functional connectivity is currently of great importance to the neuroscience community. In this paper, we introduce the 'Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives' (MTD) and then demonstrate the utility of this metric to: (i) detect dynamic changes in connectivity using data from a novel state-switching simulation; (ii) accurately estimate graph structure in a previously-described 'ground-truth' simulated dataset; and (iii) identify task-driven alterations in functional connectivity. We show that the MTD is more sensitive than existing sliding-window methods in detecting dynamic alterations in connectivity structure across a range of correlation strengths and window lengths in simulated data. In addition to the temporal precision offered by MTD, we demonstrate that the metric is also able to accurately estimate stationary network structure in both simulated and real task-based data, suggesting that the method may be used to identify dynamic changes in network structure as they evolve through time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MTD responds more strongly to changes in covariance than to changes in connectivity.

    “the MTD is more sensitive to changes in covariance than connectivity (Shine et al., 2015)”
  • Simulated data indicate that the MTD detects dynamic connectivity changes best with a seven-time-point window, optimizing both sensitivity and specificity.

    “Previous work has shown that, when using the MTD, a window length of seven time points provides optimal sensitivity and specificity for detecting dynamic changes in functional connectivity structure in simulated time series data (Shine et al., 2015).”
  • The MTD method allows greater temporal resolution of time-resolved connectivity in BOLD data than conventional sliding-window Pearson correlation.

    “we used a recently described statistical technique (Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives [MTD]; Shine et al., 2015) that allows greater temporal resolution of time-resolved connectivity in BOLD time series data when compared to the conventional sliding-window Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Shine et al., 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 166

Authors
Shine, J. M., Koyejo, O., Bell, P. T., Gorgolewski, K. J., Gilat, M., & Poldrack, R. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Shine, James M.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
122
Pages
399-407
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1431410430
Cited by
166
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
dynamic functional connectivity, time-varying connectedness, sliding window method, network structure estimation, brain network dynamics
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review