Advanced MRI techniques to improve our understanding of experience-induced neuroplasticity
Abstract
Over the last two decades, numerous human MRI studies of neuroplasticity have shown compelling evidence for extensive and rapid experience-induced brain plasticity in vivo. To date, most of these studies have consisted of simply detecting a difference in structural or functional images with little concern for their lack of biological specificity. Recent reviews and public debates have stressed the need for advanced imaging techniques to gain a better understanding of the nature of these differences - characterizing their extent in time and space, their underlying biological and network dynamics. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of advanced imaging techniques for an audience of cognitive neuroscientists that can assist them in the design and interpretation of future MRI studies of neuroplasticity. The review encompasses MRI methods that probe the morphology, microstructure, function, and connectivity of the brain with improved specificity. We underline the possible physiological underpinnings of these techniques and their recent applications within the framework of learning- and experience-induced plasticity in healthy adults. Finally, we discuss the advantages of a multi-modal approach to gain a more nuanced and comprehensive description of the process of learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Training on specific cognitive tasks induces neuroplasticity, and it is generally accepted that training impacts synaptogenesis and neurogenesis.
“Training on specific cognitive tasks induces neuroplasticity, and although the specific mechanisms are still unclear, it is generally accepted that training impacts synaptogenesis and neurogenesis [16].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 319 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Tardif, C. L., Gauthier, C. J., Steele, C. J., Bazin, P.-L., Schäfer, A., Schaefer, A., Turner, R., & Villringer, A.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Tardif, Christine Lucas
- Gauthier, Claudine Joëlle
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 55-72
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2215528050
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 319
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec
- Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- neuroplasticity, advanced MRI techniques, brain microstructure, brain connectivity, brain function, learning, multimodal imaging, structural MRI, functional MRI, diffusion MRI, resting-state fMRI
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuronal Plasticity, Species Specificity, Exercise, Models, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review