Cited by 166Action Observation and SynchronizationFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Functional connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum in social cognition: A multi-study analysis

Van Overwalle, Frank, Mariën, Peter·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

This multi-study connectivity analysis explores the functional connectivity of the cerebellum with the cerebrum in social mentalizing, that is, understanding the mind of another person. The analysis covers 5 studies (n=92) involving abstract and complex forms of social mentalizing such as (a) person and group impression formation based on behavioral descriptions and (b) constructing personal counterfactual events (i.e., how the past could have turned out better). The results suggest that cerebellar activity during these social processes reflects a domain-specific mentalizing functionality that is strongly connected with a corresponding mentalizing network in the cerebrum. A significant pattern of connectivity was found linking the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) with the right posterior cerebellum, and linking the latter with the left TPJ. In addition, in the cerebrum, further connectivity was found through links of the bilateral TPJ with the dorsal mPFC, orbitofrontal cortex and between right and left TPJ. The discussion centers on the role of these cerebro-cerebellar connections in matching external information from the cerebrum with internal predictions generated by the cerebellum. These internal predictions might involve the sequencing of the person's behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polysynaptic connections between the cerebellum and the cortex have been demonstrated in anatomic tracing and functional connectivity studies.

    “Polysynaptic connections between the cerebellum and the cortex have been demonstrated both in anatomic tracing studies and functional connectivity studies9,10,11,12,13.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 166

Authors
Van Overwalle, F., & Mariën, P.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
124
Issue
Pt A
Pages
248-255
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1564664134
Cited by
166
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
20.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cerebellum, theory of mind, impression formation, counterfactual reasoning, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, orbitofrontal cortex, posterior cerebellum, social cognition, behavior prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Cognition, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex, Cerebrum, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review