Functional connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum in social cognition: A multi-study analysis
Abstract
This multi-study connectivity analysis explores the functional connectivity of the cerebellum with the cerebrum in social mentalizing, that is, understanding the mind of another person. The analysis covers 5 studies (n=92) involving abstract and complex forms of social mentalizing such as (a) person and group impression formation based on behavioral descriptions and (b) constructing personal counterfactual events (i.e., how the past could have turned out better). The results suggest that cerebellar activity during these social processes reflects a domain-specific mentalizing functionality that is strongly connected with a corresponding mentalizing network in the cerebrum. A significant pattern of connectivity was found linking the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) with the right posterior cerebellum, and linking the latter with the left TPJ. In addition, in the cerebrum, further connectivity was found through links of the bilateral TPJ with the dorsal mPFC, orbitofrontal cortex and between right and left TPJ. The discussion centers on the role of these cerebro-cerebellar connections in matching external information from the cerebrum with internal predictions generated by the cerebellum. These internal predictions might involve the sequencing of the person's behaviors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Polysynaptic connections between the cerebellum and the cortex have been demonstrated in anatomic tracing and functional connectivity studies.
“Polysynaptic connections between the cerebellum and the cortex have been demonstrated both in anatomic tracing studies and functional connectivity studies9,10,11,12,13.”
From Regulation of autism-relevant behaviors by cerebellar-prefrontal cortical circuits (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Van Overwalle, F., & Mariën, P.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- ORCID
- Mariën, Peter
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 248-255
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1564664134
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 20.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- cerebellum, theory of mind, impression formation, counterfactual reasoning, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, orbitofrontal cortex, posterior cerebellum, social cognition, behavior prediction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebellum, Cognition, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Temporal Lobe, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex, Cerebrum, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review