Cited by 116Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Disease-specific patterns of cortical and subcortical degeneration in a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia

Landin-Romero, Ramon, Kumfor, Fiona, Leyton, Cristian E., Irish, Muireann, Hodges, John R., Piguet, Olivier·2017·NeuroImage

Abstract

Background Clinical differentiation between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is challenging due to overlapping clinical features at presentation. Whilst diagnostic criteria for both disorders incorporate evidence of frontal and temporal cortical atrophy, understanding of the progression of atrophy in these disorders is limited. This study aimed to elucidate common and disease-specific progressive changes in cortical and subcortical brain structures in AD and bvFTD.Methods Forty-one AD, 37 bvFTD and 33 healthy controls underwent baseline MRI and of these longitudinal follow-up was obtained for 20AD and 20 bvFTD (1 to 4years). A total of 87 AD and 70 bvFTD consecutive scans were included in the study. The trajectories of progression in cortical and subcortical structures were identified with FreeSurfer and linear mixed effect modelling.Results The results uncovered cortical and subcortical disease-specific trajectories of neurodegeneration in AD and bvFTD. Specifically, direct comparisons between patient groups revealed that over time AD showed greater cortical atrophy in the inferior parietal and posterior cingulate cortex than bvFTD. Conversely, bvFTD patients showed greater atrophy in the striatum than AD over time.Conclusions These results indicate that atrophy in the posterior cingulate and the striatum diverges with disease progression in these dementia syndromes and may represent a potential diagnostic biomarker for tracking rates of progression of AD and bvFTD. These findings may help inform future drug trials by identifying appropriate outcome measures to quantify drug efficacy and their ability to modulate disease progression over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 116

Authors
Landin-Romero, R., Kumfor, F., Leyton, C. E., Irish, M., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
151
Pages
72-80
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2309633614
Cited by
116
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of New South Wales
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, cortical atrophy, subcortical atrophy, posterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal cortex, striatum, disease progression, diagnostic biomarkers, longitudinal MRI
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Atrophy, Brain, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Disease Progression, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review