Integration of visual and non-visual self-motion cues during voluntary head movements in the human brain
Abstract
Our phenomenological experience of the stable world is maintained by continuous integration of visual self-motion with extra-retinal signals. However, due to conventional constraints of fMRI acquisition in humans, neural responses to visuo-vestibular integration have only been studied using artificial stimuli, in the absence of voluntary head-motion. We here circumvented these limitations and let participants to move their heads during scanning. The slow dynamics of the BOLD signal allowed us to acquire neural signal related to head motion after the observer's head was stabilized by inflatable aircushions. Visual stimuli were presented on head-fixed display goggles and updated in real time as a function of head-motion that was tracked using an external camera. Two conditions simulated forward translation of the participant. During physical head rotation, the congruent condition simulated a stable world, whereas the incongruent condition added arbitrary lateral motion. Importantly, both conditions were precisely matched in visual properties and head-rotation. By comparing congruent with incongruent conditions we found evidence consistent with the multi-modal integration of visual cues with head motion into a coherent "stable world" percept in the parietal operculum and in an anterior part of parieto-insular cortex (aPIC). In the visual motion network, human regions MST, a dorsal part of VIP, the cingulate sulcus visual area (CSv) and a region in precuneus (Pc) showed differential responses to the same contrast. The results demonstrate for the first time neural multimodal interactions between precisely matched congruent versus incongruent visual and non-visual cues during physical head-movement in the human brain. The methodological approach opens the path to a new class of fMRI studies with unprecedented temporal and spatial control over visuo-vestibular stimulation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple fMRI studies suggest that other functions associated with VIP in non-human primates, such as optic flow movement, or ego-motion and vestibular conscious perception, involve different regions in IPS and surrounding parietal cortex.
“multiple fMRI studies suggest that other functions associated with VIP in non-human primates, such as optic flow movement (Konen and Kastner 2008; Sulpizio et al. 2020), or ego-motion and vestibular conscious perception (Schindler and Bartels 2018; Aedo-Jury et al. 2020), involve different regions in the IPS and the surrounding parietal cortex.”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Schindler and Bartels 2018
Cites
Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd
Gu, Y., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2191 · Cited by 554 · see citing works
Brandt, T. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.9.1749 · Cited by 462 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While responsive to vestibular stimuli, human PIVC is suppressed by coherent motion (Brandt et al., 1998; Bucher et al., 1998; Deutschlander et al., 2002; Kleinschmidt et al., 2002).”
Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading
Butler, J. S., Smith, S. T., Campos, J. L., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.11.23 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How the Brain’s Navigation System Shapes Our Visual Experience
Nau, M., Julian, J. B., & Doeller, C. F. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.06.008 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Basile, G. A., Tatti, E., Bertino, S., Milardi, D., Genovese, G., Bruno, A., Muscatello, M. R. A., Ciurleo, R., Cerasa, A., Quartarone, A., et al. (2024) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-024-02781-9 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“…associated with VIP in non-human primates, such as optic flow movement (Konen and Kastner 2008; Sulpizio et al. 2020), or ego-motion and vestibular conscious perception (Schindler and Bartels 2018; Aedo-Jury et al. 2020), involve different regions in the IPS and the surrounding parietal cor - tex.”
BackgroundThe macaque ventral intraparietal area has expanded into three homologue human parietal areas
Foster, C., Sheng, W.-A., Heed, T., & Ben Hamed, S. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102185 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sulpizio, V., Teghil, A., Pitzalis, S., & Boccia, M. (2024) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-024-02790-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schindler, A., & Bartels, A.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schindler, Andreas
- Bartels, Andreas
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 597-607
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793909763
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Tübingen
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BA 4914/3-1, EXC307, SFB 1233)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
- Keywords
- self-motion perception, extraretinal signals, parietal operculum, visual motion processing, posterior parietal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cues, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception, Head Movements, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review