Motion correction and volumetric reconstruction for fetal functional magnetic resonance imaging data
Open accessAbstract
Motion correction is an essential preprocessing step in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the fetal brain with the aim to remove artifacts caused by fetal movement and maternal breathing and consequently to suppress erroneous signal correlations. Current motion correction approaches for fetal fMRI choose a single 3D volume from a specific acquisition timepoint with least motion artefacts as reference volume, and perform interpolation for the reconstruction of the motion corrected time series. The results can suffer, if no low-motion frame is available, and if reconstruction does not exploit any assumptions about the continuity of the fMRI signal. Here, we propose a novel framework, which estimates a high-resolution reference volume by using outlier-robust motion correction, and by utilizing Huber L2 regularization for intra-stack volumetric reconstruction of the motion-corrected fetal brain fMRI. We performed an extensive parameter study to investigate the effectiveness of motion estimation and present in this work benchmark metrics to quantify the effect of motion correction and regularised volumetric reconstruction approaches on functional connectivity computations. We demonstrate the proposed framework's ability to improve functional connectivity estimates, reproducibility and signal interpretability, which is clinically highly desirable for the establishment of prognostic noninvasive imaging biomarkers. The motion correction and volumetric reconstruction framework is made available as an open-source package of NiftyMIC.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motion correction remains challenging as fetuses move in a relatively unconstrained manner.
“Motion correction remains challenging as fetuses move in a relatively unconstrained manner, although advances in fetal MRI methodologies [77–79] have helped reduce the impact of high motion on MR images.”
From Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy (2024) · cites this paper as [79]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Gowland, P., 2010. Safety of fetal MRI scanning. In: Prayer, D. (Ed.), Fetal MRI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 49-54 .
- Licandro, R., Nenning, K.H., Schwartz, E., Kollndorfer, K., Bartha-Doering, L., Langs, G., 2016. Changing functional connectivity in the childs devel- oping brain affected by ischaemic stroke. Online proceedings of the MIC- CAI PerInatal, Preterm and Paediatric Image analysis workshop (PIPPI) 2016 . https://pippiworkshop.github.io/pippi2016/pdf/PIPPI2016_07_Licandro.pdf .
- Poldrack, R.A., Mumford, J.A., Nichols, T.E., 2011. Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press .
- Rutherford, S., Sturmfels, P., Angstadt, M., Hect, J., Wiens, J., van den Heuvel, M.I., Scheinost, D., Thomason, M., Sripada, C., 2019. Observing the origins of human brain development: automated processing of fetal fMRI. bioRxiv 525386 .
- Schwartz, E., Kasprian, G., Jakab, A., Prayer, D., Schöpf, V., Langs, G., 2016. Modeling fetal cortical expansion using graph-regularized gompertz models. In: International Con- ference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp. 247-254 .
- Taymourtash, A., Schwartz, E., Nenning, K.H., Sobotka, D., Diogo, M., Kasprian, G., Prayer, D., Langs, G., 2019. Quantifying residual motion artifacts in fetal fMRI data. In: Smart Ultrasound Imaging and Perinatal, Preterm and Paediatric Image Analysis. Springer, pp. 171-180 .
- Authors
- Sobotka, D., Ebner, M., Schwartz, E., Nenning, K.-H., Taymourtash, A., Vercauteren, T., Ourselin, S., Kasprian, G., Prayer, D., Langs, G., & Licandro, R.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- King's College London (GB)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Langs, Georg
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 255
- Pages
- 119213
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4221155301
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
- Wellcome Trust (203148/Z/16/Z, WT101957, A000049, 101957/Z/13/Z, 203148, NS/A000027/1, NS/A000049/1])
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Vienna Science and Technology Fund (LS20-030, LS20-065)
- Austrian Science Fund (I3925, P 35189)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (765148)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (NS/A000049/1, WT101957, NS /A000027/1, 203148/ Z/16/Z)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- motion correction, volumetric reconstruction, fetal brain, functional connectivity, motion artifacts, reproducibility, imaging biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Fetus, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motion, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review