Probing brain tissue microstructure with MRI: principles, challenges, and the role of multidimensional diffusion‐relaxation encoding
Open accessAbstract
Diffusion MRI uses the random displacement of water molecules to sensitize the signal to brain microstructure and to properties such as the density and shape of cells. Microstructure modeling techniques aim to estimate these properties from acquired data by separating the signal between virtual tissue ‘compartments’ such as the intra-neurite and the extra-cellular space. A key challenge is that the diffusion MRI signal is relatively featureless compared with the complexity of brain tissue. Another challenge is that the tissue microstructure is wildly different within the gray and white matter of the brain. In this review, we use results from multidimensional diffusion encoding techniques to discuss these challenges and their tentative solutions. Multidimensional encoding increases the information content of the data by varying not only the b-value and the encoding direction but also additional experimental parameters such as the shape of the b-tensor and the echo time. Three main insights have emerged from such encoding. First, multidimensional data contradict common model assumptions on diffusion and T2 relaxation and illustrates how the use of these assumptions cause erroneous interpretations in both healthy brain and pathology. Second, many model assumptions can be dispensed with if data are acquired with multidimensional encoding. The necessary data can be easily acquired in vivo using protocols optimized to minimize Cramér-Rao lower bounds. Third, microscopic diffusion anisotropy reflects the presence of axons but not dendrites. This insight stands in contrast to current ‘neurite models’ of brain tissue, which assume that axons in white matter and dendrites in gray matter feature highly similar diffusion. Nevertheless, as an axon-based contrast, microscopic anisotropy can differentiate gray and white matter when myelin alterations confound conventional MRI contrasts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease-specific processes alone, and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms.
“Interpreting MRI alterations in AD remains challenging because MRI contrasts reflect complex, combined contributions from cellular composition, microstructural organization, and biochemical changes rather than disease‐specific processes alone, 26 , 79 , 80 and provide only indirect measurements of underlying physiological mechanisms. 81”
From Diffusion MRI reveals amyloid plaque–associated cellular signatures through spatial transcriptomic integration (2026) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 194 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Lampinen, B., Szczepankiewicz, F., Lätt, J., Knutsson, L., Mårtensson, J., Björkman-Burtscher, I. M., van Westen, D., Sundgren, P. C., Ståhlberg, F., & Nilsson, M.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
- Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lampinen, Björn
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 282
- Pages
- 120338
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385973213
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 194
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Random Walk Imaging
- Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning (2014/354, 2018/1490, ALFGBG 966177, AM13–0090)
- Hjärnfonden (FO2014-0133)
- Vetenskapsrådet (2016-02199-3, 2016-03443, 2020-04549, 2021-04844)
- Region Skåne
- Cancerfonden (22 0592 JIA, CAN 2012/597, CAN 2013/321, CAN 2018/468, CAN 2019/474, CAN 2022/2414)
- Lunds Universitet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Keywords
- diffusion MRI, brain microstructure, T2 relaxation, diffusion anisotropy, axons, Cramer-Rao lower bound
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Anisotropy, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, White Matter, Gray Matter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review