Cited by 10Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation shows longitudinal improvements in memory in patients with treatment-resistant depression

Open access
Gregory, Elizabeth C., Torres, Ivan J., Blumberger, Daniel M., Downar, Jonathan, Daskalakis, Zafiris J., Vila-Rodriguez, Fidel·2022·Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface

Abstract

Background Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is a commonly reported symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) tend to experience greater rates of CD; however, treatment options are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in treating affective symptoms in patients with TRD, but its potential effect on CD in TRD has not been established. Objectives This study sought to establish the potential cognitive benefits of rTMS in patients with TRD. Materials and methods This study used data from a noninferiority clinical trial investigating two excitatory rTMS protocols to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in unipolar outpatients with TRD. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline and three months posttreatment in 47 patients and a demographically matched cohort of 22 healthy volunteers. Changes in cognitive performance from baseline to posttreatment were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, using both normative and individualized cognitive scoring methods. Results Patients with baseline neurocognitive dysfunction showed significant changes in verbal memory at three months posttreatment when using individualized cognitive scoring. Furthermore, improvement in verbal memory within this subset was associated with improvements in affective symptoms. Limitations This analysis was performed on a relatively small sample of patients with TRD who were not prescreened for CD and did not include a clinical comparator group. Conclusions rTMS may be associated with improvements in verbal memory in patients with TRD who present with global CD and who are clinical responders to the treatment. These findings warrant replication in a larger sample as well as further investigations into the neural mechanisms of cognitive improvement after rTMS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 10

Authors
Gregory, E. C., Torres, I. J., Blumberger, D. M., Downar, J., Daskalakis, Z. J., & Vila-Rodriguez, F.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
596-605
ISSN
1094-7159 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206350988
Cited by
10
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, treatment-resistant depression, cognitive impairment, verbal memory, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, major depressive disorder
MeSH terms
Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review