Normal Patterns of Spontaneous Activity Are Required for Correct Motor Axon Guidance and the Expression of Specific Guidance Molecules
Open accessAbstract
Rhythmic spontaneous electrical activity occurs in many parts of the developing nervous system, where it plays essential roles in the refinement of neural connections. By blocking or slowing this bursting activity, via in ovo drug applications at precise developmental periods, we show that such activity is also required at much earlier stages for spinal motoneurons to accurately execute their first major dorsal-ventral pathfinding decision. Blockade or slowing of rhythmic bursting activity also prevents the normal expression patterns of EphA4 and polysialic acid on NCAM, which may contribute to the pathfinding errors observed. More prolonged (E2-5) blockade resulted in a downregulation of LIM homeodomain transcription factors, but since this occurred only after the pathfinding errors and alterations in guidance molecules, it cannot have contributed to them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spontaneous activity in developing spinal circuits is vital for driving proper circuit connectivity.
“For example, during embryonic and early postnatal development, homeostatic mechanisms can ensure that spontaneous activity is present in developing spinal circuits (Gonzalez-Islas and Wenner 2006;Knogler et al. 2010), where such activity is vital for driving proper circuit connectivity (Hanson and Landmesser 2004).”
From Homeostatic Synaptic Plasticity: Local and Global Mechanisms for Stabilizing Neuronal Function (2012) · cites this paper as Hanson and Landmesser 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 378
- Authors
- Hanson, M. G., & Landmesser, L. T.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Landmesser, Lynn T.
- ORCID
- Hanson, M.Gartz
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 687-701
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077862802
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 3241 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NS19640, NS23678)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- spontaneous electrical activity, motor axon guidance, spinal motoneurons, EphA4, guidance molecules, LIM-homeodomain transcription factor, neural circuit refinement
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Membrane, Cell Movement, Chick Embryo, Motor Neurons, Nerve Growth Factors, Neural Inhibition, Sialic Acids, Spinal Cord, Down-Regulation, Receptors, Glycine, Homeodomain Proteins, Muscle, Skeletal, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, GABA Antagonists, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules, Growth Cones, Receptor, EphA4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review