Cited by 378Axon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Normal Patterns of Spontaneous Activity Are Required for Correct Motor Axon Guidance and the Expression of Specific Guidance Molecules

Open access
Hanson, M.Gartz, Landmesser, Lynn T.·2004·Neuron

Abstract

Rhythmic spontaneous electrical activity occurs in many parts of the developing nervous system, where it plays essential roles in the refinement of neural connections. By blocking or slowing this bursting activity, via in ovo drug applications at precise developmental periods, we show that such activity is also required at much earlier stages for spinal motoneurons to accurately execute their first major dorsal-ventral pathfinding decision. Blockade or slowing of rhythmic bursting activity also prevents the normal expression patterns of EphA4 and polysialic acid on NCAM, which may contribute to the pathfinding errors observed. More prolonged (E2-5) blockade resulted in a downregulation of LIM homeodomain transcription factors, but since this occurred only after the pathfinding errors and alterations in guidance molecules, it cannot have contributed to them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spontaneous activity in developing spinal circuits is vital for driving proper circuit connectivity.

    “For example, during embryonic and early postnatal development, homeostatic mechanisms can ensure that spontaneous activity is present in developing spinal circuits (Gonzalez-Islas and Wenner 2006;Knogler et al. 2010), where such activity is vital for driving proper circuit connectivity (Hanson and Landmesser 2004).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 378

Authors
Hanson, M. G., & Landmesser, L. T.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Landmesser, Lynn T.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
687-701
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077862802
Cited by
378
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS19640, NS23678)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
spontaneous electrical activity, motor axon guidance, spinal motoneurons, EphA4, guidance molecules, LIM-homeodomain transcription factor, neural circuit refinement
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cell Membrane, Cell Movement, Chick Embryo, Motor Neurons, Nerve Growth Factors, Neural Inhibition, Sialic Acids, Spinal Cord, Down-Regulation, Receptors, Glycine, Homeodomain Proteins, Muscle, Skeletal, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, GABA Antagonists, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules, Growth Cones, Receptor, EphA4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review