Cited by 602Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Bidirectional Activity-Dependent Morphological Plasticity in Hippocampal Neurons

Open access
Nägerl, U.Valentin, Eberhorn, Nicola, Cambridge, Sidney B., Bonhoeffer, Tobias·2004·Neuron

Abstract

Dendritic spines on pyramidal neurons receive the vast majority of excitatory input and are considered electrobiochemical processing units, integrating and compartmentalizing synaptic input. Following synaptic plasticity, spines can undergo morphological plasticity, which possibly forms the structural basis for long-term changes in neuronal circuitry. Here, we demonstrate that spines on CA1 pyramidal neurons from organotypic slice cultures show bidirectional activity-dependent morphological plasticity. Using two-photon time-lapse microscopy, we observed that low-frequency stimulation induced NMDA receptor-dependent spine retractions, whereas theta burst stimulation led to the formation of new spines. Moreover, without stimulation the number of spine retractions was on the same order of magnitude as the stimulus-induced spine gain or loss. Finally, we found that the ability of neurons to eliminate spines in an activity-dependent manner decreased with developmental age. Taken together, our data show that hippocampal neurons can undergo bidirectional morphological plasticity; spines are formed and eliminated in an activity-dependent way.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 602

Authors
Nägerl, U. V., Eberhorn, N., Cambridge, S. B., & Bonhoeffer, T.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Bonhoeffer, Tobias
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
759-767
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986246328
Cited by
602
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
9.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dendritic spines, morphological plasticity, NMDA receptor, theta burst stimulation, low-frequency stimulation, CA1 pyramidal neurons, hippocampus, developmental age, synaptic plasticity, organotypic slice cultures
MeSH terms
Animals, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Mice, Transgenic, Neuronal Plasticity, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Cellular Senescence, Pyramidal Cells, Dendritic Spines, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review