Cited by 346Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

The globus pallidus sends reward-related signals to the lateral habenula

Open access
Hong, Simon, Hikosaka, Okihide·2008·Neuron

Abstract

As a major output station of the basal ganglia, the globus pallidus internal segment (GPi) projects to the thalamus and brainstem nuclei thereby controlling motor behavior. A less well known fact is that the GPi also projects to the lateral habenula (LHb) which is often associated with the limbic system. Using the monkey performing a saccade task with positionally biased reward outcomes, we found that antidromically identified LHb-projecting neurons were distributed mainly in the dorsal and ventral borders of the GPi and that their activity was strongly modulated by expected reward outcomes. A majority of them were excited by the no-reward-predicting target and inhibited by the reward-predicting target. These reward-dependent modulations were similar to those in LHb neurons but started earlier than those in LHb neurons. These results suggest that GPi may initiate reward-related signals through its effects on the LHb, which then influences the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.035

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LHb-projecting EP/GPi neurons were first suggested to be glutamatergic, purely excitatory, and to signal aversive/negative outcomes.

    “Due to immunohistochemical and behavioral findings, LHb-projecting EP/GPi neurons were first suggested to be glutamatergic, purely excitatory, and signal aversive/negative outcomes.38,39”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 346

Authors
Hong, S., & Hikosaka, O.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hikosaka, Okihide
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
720-729
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009299837
Cited by
346
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Eye Institute (Z01EY000415)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
lateral habenula, basal ganglia, reward prediction, saccade task, antidromic identification, dopaminergic system, serotonergic system, limbic system
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Biogenic Amines, Emotions, Globus Pallidus, Limbic System, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Saccades, Bias, Habenula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review