The globus pallidus sends reward-related signals to the lateral habenula
Open accessAbstract
As a major output station of the basal ganglia, the globus pallidus internal segment (GPi) projects to the thalamus and brainstem nuclei thereby controlling motor behavior. A less well known fact is that the GPi also projects to the lateral habenula (LHb) which is often associated with the limbic system. Using the monkey performing a saccade task with positionally biased reward outcomes, we found that antidromically identified LHb-projecting neurons were distributed mainly in the dorsal and ventral borders of the GPi and that their activity was strongly modulated by expected reward outcomes. A majority of them were excited by the no-reward-predicting target and inhibited by the reward-predicting target. These reward-dependent modulations were similar to those in LHb neurons but started earlier than those in LHb neurons. These results suggest that GPi may initiate reward-related signals through its effects on the LHb, which then influences the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LHb-projecting EP/GPi neurons were first suggested to be glutamatergic, purely excitatory, and to signal aversive/negative outcomes.
“Due to immunohistochemical and behavioral findings, LHb-projecting EP/GPi neurons were first suggested to be glutamatergic, purely excitatory, and signal aversive/negative outcomes.38,39”
From Synaptic and circuit functions of multitransmitter neurons in the mammalian brain (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 346
- Authors
- Hong, S., & Hikosaka, O.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hikosaka, Okihide
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 720-729
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2638585
- OpenAlex
- W2009299837
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (Z01EY000415)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- lateral habenula, basal ganglia, reward prediction, saccade task, antidromic identification, dopaminergic system, serotonergic system, limbic system
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Biogenic Amines, Emotions, Globus Pallidus, Limbic System, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Saccades, Bias, Habenula
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review