Cited by 212Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Classical MHCI Molecules Regulate Retinogeniculate Refinement and Limit Ocular Dominance Plasticity

Open access
Datwani, Akash, McConnell, Michael J., Kanold, Patrick O., Micheva, Kristina D., Busse, Brad, Shamloo, Mehrdad, Smith, Stephen J., Shatz, Carla J.·2009·Neuron

Abstract

Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHCI) genes were discovered unexpectedly in healthy CNS neurons in a screen for genes regulated by neural activity. In mice lacking just 2 of the 50+ MHCI genes H2-K(b) and H2-D(b), ocular dominance (OD) plasticity is enhanced. Mice lacking PirB, an MHCI receptor, have a similar phenotype. H2-K(b) and H2-D(b) are expressed not only in visual cortex, but also in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), where protein localization correlates strongly with synaptic markers and complement protein C1q. In K(b)D(b-/-) mice, developmental refinement of retinogeniculate projections is impaired, similar to C1q(-/-) mice. These phenotypes in K(b)D(b-/-) mice are strikingly similar to those in beta2 m(-/-)TAP1(-/-) mice, which lack cell surface expression of all MHCIs, implying that H2-K(b) and H2-D(b) can account for observed changes in synapse plasticity. H2-K(b) and H2-D(b) ligands, signaling via neuronal MHCI receptors, may enable activity-dependent remodeling of brain circuits during developmental critical periods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.10.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MHC class I molecules have been shown to be activity-dependent, localized to synapses, and co-localized with C1q.

    “For example, MHC class I molecules, another class of immune molecules demonstrated to play a role in retinogeniculate pruning, have been shown to be activity-dependent, localized to synapses, and co-localized with C1q leaving the possibility that MHC class I molecules may play an upstream role in microglia-mediated pruning of synapses (Corriveau et al., 1998; Datwani et al., 2009; Goddard et al.,”
  • Many immune proteins have non-immune roles in the healthy nervous system, where they are required for normal neuronal development, dendritic morphology, and synaptic transmission.

    “many immune proteins have non-immune roles in the healthy nervous system, where they are required for normal neuronal development, dendritic morphology, and synaptic transmission.”
  • Proteins of the complement cascade (including C1q, C3, and C4) and members of MHCI (including H2-K and H2-D) contribute to synapse elimination in the developing visual system.

    “proteins of the complement cascade (including C1q, C3, and C4) and members of MHCI (including H2-K and H2-D) contribute to synapse elimination in the developing visual system.20,21,22,23,24,25”
  • A growing number of immune proteins have been identified that play central roles in neuronal homeostasis, where they negatively regulate neurite length, dendritic complexity, and synaptic transmission, and many are upregulated by TLR9.

    “A growing number of immune proteins have been identified that play central roles in neuronal homeostasis, where they negatively regulate neurite length, dendritic complexity, and synaptic transmission,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,45,46,48,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79 and many are upregulated by TLR9.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 212

Authors
Datwani, A., McConnell, M. J., Kanold, P. O., Micheva, K. D., Busse, B., Shamloo, M., Smith, S. J., & Shatz, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Shatz, Carla J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
463-470
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063781019
Cited by
212
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 25
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 EY02858, R01 MH071666)
  • G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation (T32CA09361)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
MHC class I, ocular dominance plasticity, H-2Kb, PirB, lateral geniculate nucleus, visual cortex, C1q, synaptic plasticity, beta2m, TAP1, critical period
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Geniculate Bodies, H-2 Antigens, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Neuronal Plasticity, Retina, Visual Pathways, Neuroimmunomodulation, Mice, Knockout, Dominance, Ocular, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review