Closing the Gate in the Limbic Striatum: Prefrontal Suppression of Hippocampal and Thalamic Inputs
Open accessAbstract
Many brain circuits control behavior by integrating information arising from separate inputs onto a common target neuron. Neurons in the ventral striatum (VS) receive converging excitatory afferents from the prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus (HP), and thalamus, among other structures, and the integration of these inputs is critical for goal-directed behaviors. Although HP inputs have been described as gating PFC throughput in the VS, recent data reveal that the VS desynchronizes from the HP during epochs of burst-like PFC activity related to decision making. It is therefore possible that PFC inputs locally attenuate responses to other glutamatergic inputs to the VS. Here, we found that delivering trains of stimuli to the PFC suppresses HP- and thalamus-evoked synaptic responses in the VS, in part through activation of inhibitory processes. This interaction may enable the PFC to exert influence on basal ganglia loops during decision-making instances with minimal disturbance from ongoing contextual inputs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
mPFC efferents to the nucleus accumbens affect information processing in striatal projection neurons.
“mPFC efferents to the latter affect information processing in striatal projection neurons119”
From Resolving the neural circuits of anxiety (2015) · cites this paper as [119]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Calhoon, G. G., & O’Donnell, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- O’Donnell, Patricio
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 181-190
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3627185
- OpenAlex
- W2115261275
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R31 MH092043, F31MH092043, R01MH060131)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- ventral striatum, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, synaptic inhibition, decision-making, basal ganglia, glutamatergic synapses, neural desynchronization, goal-directed behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Basal Ganglia, Biophysics, Brain Mapping, Efferent Pathways, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Membrane Potentials, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Picrotoxin, Synapses, Thalamus, Prefrontal Cortex, GABA Antagonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review