Cited by 194Memory Processes and InfluencesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Savoring the past: Positive memories evoke value representations in the striatum

Open access
Speer, Megan E., Bhanji, Jamil P., Delgado, Mauricio R.·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Reminders of happy memories can bring back pleasant feelings tied to the original experience, suggesting an intrinsic value in reminiscing about the positive past. However, the neural circuitry underlying the rewarding aspects of autobiographical memory is poorly understood. Using fMRI, we observed enhanced activity during the recall of positive relative to neutral autobiographical memories in corticostriatal circuits that also responded to monetary reward. Enhanced activity in the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex was associated with increases in positive emotion during recall, and striatal engagement further correlated with individual measures of resiliency. Striatal response to the recall of positive memories was greater in individuals whose mood improved after the task. Notably, participants were willing to sacrifice a more tangible reward, money, in order to reminisce about positive past experiences. Our findings suggest that recalling positive autobiographical memories is intrinsically valuable, which may be adaptive for regulating positive emotion and promoting better well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 194

Authors
Speer, M. E., Bhanji, J. P., & Delgado, M. R.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Delgado, Mauricio R.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
847-856
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041010700
Cited by
194
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 084081, R01MH084081)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-027764, R01DA027764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
autobiographical memory, striatum, corticostriatal circuits, medial prefrontal cortex, monetary rewards, positive emotions, resilience, well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Reward, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review