Savoring the past: Positive memories evoke value representations in the striatum
Open accessAbstract
Reminders of happy memories can bring back pleasant feelings tied to the original experience, suggesting an intrinsic value in reminiscing about the positive past. However, the neural circuitry underlying the rewarding aspects of autobiographical memory is poorly understood. Using fMRI, we observed enhanced activity during the recall of positive relative to neutral autobiographical memories in corticostriatal circuits that also responded to monetary reward. Enhanced activity in the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex was associated with increases in positive emotion during recall, and striatal engagement further correlated with individual measures of resiliency. Striatal response to the recall of positive memories was greater in individuals whose mood improved after the task. Notably, participants were willing to sacrifice a more tangible reward, money, in order to reminisce about positive past experiences. Our findings suggest that recalling positive autobiographical memories is intrinsically valuable, which may be adaptive for regulating positive emotion and promoting better well-being.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Engaging in kind acts and savoring positive memories activate the striatum.
“For example, engaging in kind acts (charitable donation)(41) and savoring positive memories(42) activate the striatum.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- Speer, M. E., Bhanji, J. P., & Delgado, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Delgado, Mauricio R.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 847-856
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4254527
- OpenAlex
- W2041010700
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 084081, R01MH084081)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-027764, R01DA027764)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, striatum, corticostriatal circuits, medial prefrontal cortex, monetary rewards, positive emotions, resilience, well-being
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Mental Recall, Reward, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Memory, Episodic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review