Cited by 183Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Abstract context representations in primate amygdala and prefrontal cortex

Open access
Saez, A., Rigotti, M., Ostojic, S., Fusi, S., Salzman, C.D.·2015·Neuron

Abstract

Neurons in prefrontal cortex (PFC) encode rules, goals, and other abstract information thought to underlie cognitive, emotional, and behavioral flexibility. Here we show that the amygdala, a brain area traditionally thought to mediate emotions, also encodes abstract information that could underlie this flexibility. Monkeys performed a task in which stimulus-reinforcement contingencies varied between two sets of associations, each defining a context. Reinforcement prediction required identifying a stimulus and knowing the current context. Behavioral evidence indicated that monkeys utilized this information to perform inference and adjust their behavior. Neural representations in both amygdala and PFC reflected the linked sets of associations implicitly defining each context, a process requiring a level of abstraction characteristic of cognitive operations. Surprisingly, when errors were made, the context signal weakened substantially in the amygdala. These data emphasize the importance of maintaining abstract cognitive information in the amygdala to support flexible behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cholinergic signaling in the monkey amygdala may also play a role in this switch.

    “Cholinergic signaling in the monkey amygdala may also play a role in this switch [59].”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 183

Authors
Saez, A., Rigotti, M., Ostojic, S., Fusi, S., & Salzman, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Salzman, C.D.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
869-881
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1629577552
Cited by
183
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-0087)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082017)
  • National Eye Institute (P30EY019007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
amygdala, prefrontal cortex, cognitive flexibility, monkeys
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Brain Mapping, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Primates, Reinforcement, Psychology, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review