The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity
Open accessAbstract
Curiosity is a basic element of our cognition, but its biological function, mechanisms, and neural underpinning remain poorly understood. It is nonetheless a motivator for learning, influential in decision-making, and crucial for healthy development. One factor limiting our understanding of it is the lack of a widely agreed upon delineation of what is and is not curiosity. Another factor is the dearth of standardized laboratory tasks that manipulate curiosity in the lab. Despite these barriers, recent years have seen a major growth of interest in both the neuroscience and psychology of curiosity. In this Perspective, we advocate for the importance of the field, provide a selective overview of its current state, and describe tasks that are used to study curiosity and information-seeking. We propose that, rather than worry about defining curiosity, it is more helpful to consider the motivations for information-seeking behavior and to study it in its ethological context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has shown that because agents find pleasure in reducing manageable uncertainty, they are attracted to just-uncertain-enough environments”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 6,855
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641
Conflict, arousal, and curiosity.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11164-000 · Cited by 6,018
Play, Dreams And Imitation In Childhood
Piaget, J. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315009698 · Cited by 5,404
On aims and methods of ethology
Tinbergen, N. (1963) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x · Cited by 4,551
The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis
Jones, F. N., & Skinner, B. F. (1939) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416495 · Cited by 4,388
The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation.
Loewenstein, G. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75 · Cited by 2,738
Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex.
Pavlov, P. I. (1930) · Archives of Neurology And Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1930.02220110256018 · Cited by 2,681
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pelz, M., Yung, A., and Kidd, C. (2015). Quantifying curiosity and exploratory play on touchscreen tablets. G. Gordon, J. Jirout, S. Engel, and A. Chang, eds. Proceedings of the IDC 2015 Workshop on Digital Assessment and Promotion of Children’s Curiosity, http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/mpelz/PelzYungKiddIDC2015.pdf.
- Wagner, 1986, A process analysis of infant visual and crossmodal recognition memory: implications for an amodal code, Advances in Infancy Research, 4, 195
- Yarbus, 1956, The motion of the eye in the process of changing points of fixation, Biofizika, 1, 76
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and management
Sgalla, G., Iovene, B., Calvello, M., Ori, M., Varone, F., & Richeldi, L. (2018) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-018-0730-2 · Cited by 573
Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity
Gottlieb, J., & Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0 · Cited by 494
Intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and learning
Oudeyer, P., Gottlieb, J. P., & Lopes, M. C. (2016) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.005 · Cited by 453
How people decide what they want to know
Sharot, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1 · Cited by 386
Process Account of Curiosity and Interest: A Reward-Learning Perspective
Murayama, K., FitzGibbon, L., & Sakaki, M. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hayden, Benjamin Y.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 449-460
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4635443
- OpenAlex
- W2147130840
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 136
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 156 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 144 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 11
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA038615)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- curiosity, information seeking, motivation, decision-making, student motivation, ethology
- MeSH terms
- Cognitive Neuroscience, Animals, Decision Making, Exploratory Behavior, Humans, Learning, Motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
