Cited by 351Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural Networks and Applications

Recurrent network models of sequence generation and memory

Open access
Rajan, Kanaka, Harvey, Christopher D., Tank, David W.·2016·Neuron

Abstract

Sequential activation of neurons is a common feature of network activity during a variety of behaviors, including working memory and decision making. Previous network models for sequences and memory emphasized specialized architectures in which a principled mechanism is pre-wired into their connectivity. Here we demonstrate that, starting from random connectivity and modifying a small fraction of connections, a largely disordered recurrent network can produce sequences and implement working memory efficiently. We use this process, called Partial In-Network Training (PINning), to model and match cellular resolution imaging data from the posterior parietal cortex during a virtual memory-guided two-alternative forced-choice task. Analysis of the connectivity reveals that sequences propagate by the cooperation between recurrent synaptic interactions and external inputs, rather than through feedforward or asymmetric connections. Together our results suggest that neural sequences may emerge through learning from largely unstructured network architectures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This has already been done to aid the interpretation of the neural dynamics underlying decision making in the PFC, working memory in the posterior parietal cortex, and object or action representation in the visual system.

    “This has already been done to aid the interpretation of the neural dynamics underlying decision making in the PFC (Sussillo, 2014), working memory in the posterior parietal cortex (Rajan et al., 2016) and object or action representation in the visual system (Tacchetti et al., 2016; Yamins and DiCarlo, 2016a,b).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Rajan et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 84 · Cited by 351

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jaeger H Becker S Thrun S Obermayer K Adaptive nonlinear system identification with echo state networks Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2003 15 Cambridge MA MIT Press 593 600

Authors
Rajan, K., Harvey, C. D., & Tank, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rajan, Kanaka
  • Harvey, Christopher D.
  • Tank, David W.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
128-142
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295845209
Cited by
351
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
24.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh083686-10)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107620, R01-MH083686)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS090541, R01NS089521, RC1NS068148)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
recurrent neural networks, neural sequences, working memory, random connectivity, posterior parietal cortex, two-alternative forced-choice task, cellular resolution imaging, synaptic interactions, memory-guided behavior
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review