Dendritic Spines Prevent Synaptic Voltage Clamp
Open accessAbstract
Synapses are the fundamental units of information processing in the mammalian brain. Much of our understanding of their functional properties comes from voltage-clamp analysis, the predominant approach for investigating synaptic physiology. Here, we reveal that voltage clamp is completely ineffective for most excitatory synapses due to spine electrical compartmentalization. Under local dendritic voltage clamp, single-spine activation produced large spine head depolarizations that severely distorted measurements and recruited voltage-dependent channels. To overcome these voltage-clamp errors, we developed an approach to provide new, accurate measurements of synaptic conductance. Single-synapse AMPA conductance was much larger than previously appreciated, producing saturation effects on synaptic currents. We conclude that electrical compartmentalization profoundly shapes both synaptic function and how that function can be assessed with electrophysiological methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activating VDCCs, which are present in spines, evokes cytosolic spine Ca2+ transients and the activation of cytosolic spine CaMKII.
“Activating VDCCs, which are present in spines, evokes cytosolic spine Ca2+ transients (185–187) and the activation of cytosolic spine CaMKII (188).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [186]
Because of the high spine neck resistance (~1 GΩ), an unpotentiated EPSP can approximate 25 mV.
“Because of the high spine neck resistance (∼1 GΩ) it is calculated that an unpotentiated EPSP can approximate 25 mV (185, 186).”
From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [186]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Beaulieu-Laroche, L., & Harnett, M. T.
- Affiliations
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Harnett, Mark T.
- ORCID
- Harnett, Mark T.
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 75-82.e3
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2773724363
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- dendritic spines, excitatory synapses, voltage-gated ion channels
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Male, Membrane Potentials, Synaptic Transmission, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pyramidal Cells, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Dendritic Spines, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review