The Locus Coeruleus Is a Complex and Differentiated Neuromodulatory System
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Diffuse projections of locus coeruleus (LC) neurons and evidence of synchronous spiking have long been perceived as features of global neuromodulation. Recent studies demonstrated the possibility of targeted modulation by subsets of LC neurons. Non-global neuromodulation depends on target specificity and the differentiated spatiotemporal dynamics within LC. Here, we characterized interactions between 3,164 LC cell pairs in the rat LC under urethane anesthesia. Spike count correlations were near zero and only a small proportion of unit pairs had synchronized spontaneous (15%) or evoked (16%) discharge. We identified infra-slow (0.01-1 Hz) fluctuations of LC unit spike rate, which were also asynchronous across the population. Despite overall sparse population synchrony, we report the existence of LC ensembles and relate them to forebrain projection targets. We also show that spike waveform width was related to ensemble membership, propensity for synchronization, and interactions with cortex. Our findings suggest a partly differentiated and target-specific noradrenergic signal.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cells in the dorsal aspects of the LC-NA project to the frontal and parietal cortices and are thought to be strongly associated with arousal and vigilance.
“Cells in the dorsal aspects of the LC-NA have also been shown to project to the frontal and parietal cortices where they are thought to be strongly associated with arousal and vigilance51,52.”
From Brainstem noradrenergic modulation of the kisspeptin neuron GnRH pulse generator in mice (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 137 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Totah, N. K., Neves, R. M., Panzeri, S., Logothetis, N. K., & Eschenko, O.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
- Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Totah, Nelson K.
- Eschenko, Oxana
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1055-1068.e6
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887925139
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Union FP7 (PIIF-GA-2012-331122, SICODE)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Keywords
- locus coeruleus, noradrenergic system, neuromodulation, neuronal synchronization, spike count correlations, neuronal ensembles, forebrain projections, corticofugal projections
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Electric Stimulation, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Neurons, Random Allocation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review