Cited by 179Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

The Locus Coeruleus Is a Complex and Differentiated Neuromodulatory System

Open access
Totah, Nelson K., Neves, Ricardo M., Panzeri, Stefano, Logothetis, Nikos K., Eschenko, Oxana·2018·Neuron

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Diffuse projections of locus coeruleus (LC) neurons and evidence of synchronous spiking have long been perceived as features of global neuromodulation. Recent studies demonstrated the possibility of targeted modulation by subsets of LC neurons. Non-global neuromodulation depends on target specificity and the differentiated spatiotemporal dynamics within LC. Here, we characterized interactions between 3,164 LC cell pairs in the rat LC under urethane anesthesia. Spike count correlations were near zero and only a small proportion of unit pairs had synchronized spontaneous (15%) or evoked (16%) discharge. We identified infra-slow (0.01-1 Hz) fluctuations of LC unit spike rate, which were also asynchronous across the population. Despite overall sparse population synchrony, we report the existence of LC ensembles and relate them to forebrain projection targets. We also show that spike waveform width was related to ensemble membership, propensity for synchronization, and interactions with cortex. Our findings suggest a partly differentiated and target-specific noradrenergic signal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.037

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cells in the dorsal aspects of the LC-NA project to the frontal and parietal cortices and are thought to be strongly associated with arousal and vigilance.

    “Cells in the dorsal aspects of the LC-NA have also been shown to project to the frontal and parietal cortices where they are thought to be strongly associated with arousal and vigilance51,52.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 179

Authors
Totah, N. K., Neves, R. M., Panzeri, S., Logothetis, N. K., & Eschenko, O.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Totah, Nelson K.
  • Eschenko, Oxana
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
1055-1068.e6
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887925139
Cited by
179
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
FWCI
7.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union FP7 (PIIF-GA-2012-331122, SICODE)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
locus coeruleus, noradrenergic system, neuromodulation, neuronal synchronization, spike count correlations, neuronal ensembles, forebrain projections, corticofugal projections
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Electric Stimulation, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Neurons, Random Allocation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review