Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Evolution is a blind fitting process by which organisms become adapted to their environment. Does the brain use similar brute-force fitting processes to learn how to perceive and act upon the world? Recent advances in artificial neural networks have exposed the power of optimizing millions of synaptic weights over millions of observations to operate robustly in real-world contexts. These models do not learn simple, human-interpretable rules or representations of the world; rather, they use local computations to interpolate over task-relevant manifolds in a high-dimensional parameter space. Counterintuitively, similar to evolutionary processes, over-parameterized models can be simple and parsimonious, as they provide a versatile, robust solution for learning a diverse set of functions. This new family of direct-fit models present a radical challenge to many of the theoretical assumptions in psychology and neuroscience. At the same time, this shift in perspective establishes unexpected links with developmental and ecological psychology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Connectionist AI systems autonomously learn how to achieve their goals and encode their knowledge within the structure and weights of the neural network.
“Unlike symbolic AI systems or the Chinese room operator, which are provided with explicit instructions, connectionist AI systems autonomously learn how to achieve their goals and encode their knowledge within the structure and weights of the neural network.”
From Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 182 · Cited by 387
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Fodor JA (1983). Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
- Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, and Bengio Y (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, pp. 2672– 2680.
- Hewitt J, and Manning CD (2019). A structural probe for finding syntax in word representations. In Proc. North Am. Chap. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Hum. Lang. Technol, pp. 4129– 4138.
- Raghu M, Poole B, Kleinberg J, Ganguli S, and Dickstein JS (2017). On the expressive power of deep neural networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn, pp. 2847– 2854.
- Wittgenstein L (1953). Philosophical Investigations, Anscombe GEM, trans. (London, England: McMillan).
- Authors
- Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hasson, Uri
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 416-434
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7096172
- OpenAlex
- W3004619146
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 182
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 31 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- overparameterized neural networks, synaptic weights, brain learning, ecological psychology, developmental psychology, generalization, high-dimensional parameter spaces
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Learning, Nerve Net, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review