Cited by 387Neural Networks and ApplicationsEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeural dynamics and brain function

Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks

Open access
Hasson, Uri, Nastase, Samuel A., Goldstein, Ariel·2020·Neuron

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Evolution is a blind fitting process by which organisms become adapted to their environment. Does the brain use similar brute-force fitting processes to learn how to perceive and act upon the world? Recent advances in artificial neural networks have exposed the power of optimizing millions of synaptic weights over millions of observations to operate robustly in real-world contexts. These models do not learn simple, human-interpretable rules or representations of the world; rather, they use local computations to interpolate over task-relevant manifolds in a high-dimensional parameter space. Counterintuitively, similar to evolutionary processes, over-parameterized models can be simple and parsimonious, as they provide a versatile, robust solution for learning a diverse set of functions. This new family of direct-fit models present a radical challenge to many of the theoretical assumptions in psychology and neuroscience. At the same time, this shift in perspective establishes unexpected links with developmental and ecological psychology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Connectionist AI systems autonomously learn how to achieve their goals and encode their knowledge within the structure and weights of the neural network.

    “Unlike symbolic AI systems or the Chinese room operator, which are provided with explicit instructions, connectionist AI systems autonomously learn how to achieve their goals and encode their knowledge within the structure and weights of the neural network.”

    From Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks (2024) · cites this paper as [69]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 182 · Cited by 387

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Fodor JA (1983). Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
  2. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, and Bengio Y (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, pp. 2672– 2680.
  3. Hewitt J, and Manning CD (2019). A structural probe for finding syntax in word representations. In Proc. North Am. Chap. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Hum. Lang. Technol, pp. 4129– 4138.
  4. Raghu M, Poole B, Kleinberg J, Ganguli S, and Dickstein JS (2017). On the expressive power of deep neural networks. In Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn, pp. 2847– 2854.
  5. Wittgenstein L (1953). Philosophical Investigations, Anscombe GEM, trans. (London, England: McMillan).

Authors
Hasson, U., Nastase, S. A., & Goldstein, A.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Hasson, Uri
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
105
Issue
3
Pages
416-434
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004619146
Cited by
387
References
182
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 31 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
overparameterized neural networks, synaptic weights, brain learning, ecological psychology, developmental psychology, generalization, high-dimensional parameter spaces
MeSH terms
Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Learning, Nerve Net, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review