Decision-making as transdiagnostic construct for mental health research
Open accessAbstract
Transdiagnostic research and linking behavioral, neural, and symptom measures are important endeavors in clinical neuroscience and biological psychiatry. In this issue of Neuron, Moutoussis et al. (2021) describe a new cognitive construct-decision acuity-that is related to mental health symptoms and distinct resting-state networks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders, including MDD, OCD, and schizophrenia, and are linked to their specific symptoms.
“Decision-making and learning impairments are core characteristics of a wide range of psychiatric disorders — such as major depressive disorder (MDD), obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and schizophrenia — and are linked to their specific symptoms.1–9”
From Investigating disorder-specific and transdiagnostic alterations in model-based and model-free decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Endrass, T., & Ullsperger, M.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ullsperger, Markus
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1912-1914
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3171459929
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 380 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1436, SFB 940, TRR 265)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- decision-making, transdiagnostic constructs, psychiatric symptoms, resting-state networks, cognitive constructs, neural correlates of decision making
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Neurosciences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
