Cited by 25Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Structure and dynamics of differential ligand binding in the human ρ-type GABAA receptor

Open access
Cowgill, John, Fan, Chen, Haloi, Nandan, Tobiasson, Victor, Zhuang, Yuxuan, Howard, Rebecca J., Lindahl, Erik·2023·Neuron

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

SUMMARY The neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) drives critical inhibitory processes in and beyond the nervous system, partly via ionotropic type-A receptors (GABA A Rs). Pharmacological properties of ρ-type GABA A Rs are particularly distinctive, yet the structural basis for their specialization remains unclear. Here we present cryo-EM structures of a lipid-embedded human ρ1 GABA A R, including a partial intracellular domain, under apo, inhibited, and desensitized conditions. An apparent resting state, determined first in the absence of modulators, was recapitulated with the specific inhibitor (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid and blocker picrotoxin, and provided a rationale for bicuculline insensitivity. Comparative structures, mutant recordings, and molecular simulations with and without GABA further explained the sensitized but slower activation of ρ1 relative to canonical subtypes. Combining GABA with picrotoxin also captured an apparent uncoupled intermediate state. This work reveals structural mechanisms of gating and modulation with applications to ρ-specific pharmaceutical design, and to our biophysical understanding of ligand-gated ion channels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cowgill, J., Fan, C., Haloi, N., Tobiasson, V., Zhuang, Y., Howard, R. J., & Lindahl, E.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Howard, Rebecca J.
  • Lindahl, Erik
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
111
Issue
21
Pages
3450-3464.e5
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386378508
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking
  • Kempe Foundation
  • Swedish e-Science Research Centre
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2021-05806)
  • Kempestiftelserna
  • Stockholms Universitet (FV‐5.1.2‐0523‐19)
  • Science for Life Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
ligand-gated ion channels, GABA binding, picrotoxin, receptor desensitization, receptor gating, cryo-EM structure, receptor modulation, ion channel structure
MeSH terms
Bicuculline, Binding Sites, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Ligands, Picrotoxin, Receptors, GABA-A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review