Cited by 101Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Effects of amphetamine isomers, methylphenidate and atomoxetine on synaptosomal and synaptic vesicle accumulation and release of dopamine and noradrenaline in vitro in the rat brain

Easton, Neil, Steward, Carolyn, Marshall, Fiona, Fone, Kevin, Marsden, Charles·2007·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

D- and L-amphetamine sulphate isomers, methylphenidate and atomoxetine, are effective treatments for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This study provides a detailed comparison of their effects on the synaptosomal and vesicular accumulation of dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA) and release in vitro in rat prefrontal cortex and striatum. D-amphetamine was more potent than L-amphetamine at inhibiting accumulation of DA or NA in synaptosomes and vesicles. All drugs were weaker at inhibiting the accumulation of vesicular DA and NA compared to synaptosomal accumulation and more potently inhibited NA accumulation than DA. Methylphenidate was weak at inhibiting vesicular accumulation of DA and NA compared to its potent synaptosomal effects. The D-isomer had greater potency than the L-isomer on basal and electrically stimulated striatal DA release; however the L-isomer was 2-fold more potent than the D-isomer on basal fronto-cortical NA release. The selective DA reuptake inhibitor, GBR-12909 and NA reuptake inhibitors, maprotiline and atomoxetine, had different release profiles both on the potency and magnitude of basal and stimulated DA and NA release compared to the amphetamine isomers. These results identify distinct pharmacological action by the amphetamine isomers on dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission, which may impact on their therapeutic effects in the treatment of ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.07.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 101

Authors
Easton, N., Steward, C., Marshall, F., Fone, K., & Marsden, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Easton, Neil
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
405-414
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045118876
Cited by
101
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shire
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
d-amphetamine, L-amphetamine, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, dopamine accumulation, noradrenaline accumulation, synaptic vesicles, synaptosomes, dopamine release, noradrenaline release, prefrontal cortex, striatum, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dopamine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, GBR 12909, maprotiline
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Animals, Brain, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Methylphenidate, Models, Biological, Norepinephrine, Propylamines, Synaptic Vesicles, Synaptosomes, Tritium, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Adrenergic Agents, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review