Cited by 163Memory and Neural MechanismsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Cannabinoid facilitation of fear extinction memory recall in humans

Open access
Rabinak, Christine A., Angstadt, Mike, Sripada, Chandra S., Abelson, James L., Liberzon, Israel, Milad, Mohammed R., Phan, K. Luan·2013·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

A first-line approach to treat anxiety disorders is exposure-based therapy, which relies on extinction processes such as repeatedly exposing the patient to stimuli (conditioned stimuli; CS) associated with the traumatic, fear-related memory. However, a significant number of patients fail to maintain their gains, partly attributed to the fact that this inhibitory learning and its maintenance is temporary and conditioned fear responses can return. Animal studies have shown that activation of the cannabinoid system during extinction learning enhances fear extinction and its retention. Specifically, CB1 receptor agonists, such as Δ9-tetrahydrocannibinol (THC), can facilitate extinction recall by preventing recovery of extinguished fear in rats. However, this phenomenon has not been investigated in humans. We conducted a study using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subjects design, coupling a standard Pavlovian fear extinction paradigm and simultaneous skin conductance response (SCR) recording with an acute pharmacological challenge with oral dronabinol (synthetic THC) or placebo (PBO) 2 h prior to extinction learning in 29 healthy adult volunteers (THC = 14; PBO = 15) and tested extinction retention 24 h after extinction learning. Compared to subjects that received PBO, subjects that received THC showed low SCR to a previously extinguished CS when extinction memory recall was tested 24 h after extinction learning, suggesting that THC prevented the recovery of fear. These results provide the first evidence that pharmacological enhancement of extinction learning is feasible in humans using cannabinoid system modulators, which may thus warrant further development and clinical testing. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.063

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 163

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First MB Spitzter RL Gibbon M Williams JB 2002 Structured clinical interivew for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition (SCID-I/NP) Biometrics Reserach Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York
  2. Howlett AC Pertwee RG 2005 Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling Cannabinoids Springer Berlin Heidelberg 53 79

Authors
Rabinak, C. A., Angstadt, M., Sripada, C. S., Abelson, J. L., Liberzon, I., Milad, M. R., & Phan, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rabinak, Christine A.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
64
Pages
396-402
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295990315
Cited by
163
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear extinction, dronabinol, tetrahydrocannabinol, endocannabinoid system, CB1 receptor agonists, extinction retention, skin conductance response, fear conditioning, anxiety disorders, exposure therapy, nootropic drugs
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cannabinoids, Double-Blind Method, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mental Recall, Dronabinol, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Nootropic Agents, Young Adult, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Memory, Episodic, Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review