Interoception and drug addiction
Open accessAbstract
The role of interoception and its neural basis with relevance to drug addiction is reviewed. Interoception consists of the receiving, processing, and integrating body-relevant signals with external stimuli to affect ongoing motivated behavior. The insular cortex is the central nervous system hub to process and integrate these signals. Interoception is an important component of several addiction relevant constructs including arousal, attention, stress, reward, and conditioning. Imaging studies with drug-addicted individuals show that the insular cortex is hypo-active during cognitive control processes but hyperactive during cue reactivity and drug-specific, reward-related processes. It is proposed that interoception contributes to drug addiction by incorporating an "embodied" experience of drug uses together with the individual's predicted versus actual internal state to modulate approach or avoidance behavior, i.e. whether to take or not to take drugs. This opens the possibility of two types of interventions. First, one may be able to modulate the embodied experience by enhancing insula reactivity where necessary, e.g. when engaging in drug seeking behavior, or attenuating insula when exposed to drug-relevant cues. Second, one may be able to reduce the urge to act by increasing the frontal control network, i.e. inhibiting the urge to use by employing cognitive training. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'NIDA 40th Anniversary Issue'.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with SUD have overactivation of the insula in response to drug-related cues and show attenuated insula activation when processing standard interoceptive cues.
“Specifically, patients with SUD have overactivation of the insula in response to drug related cues and show attenuated insula activation when processing standard interoceptive cues 18,19.”
From Effects of a trauma-informed mindful recovery program on comorbid pain, anxiety, and substance use during primary care buprenorphine treatment: A proof-of-concept study (2023) · cites this paper as [18]
Section 4 (Cocaine; page unavailable) reports heightened insula responses to cocaine-related cues, and the Cannabis subsection describes a similar response to marijuana cues. It reports attenuated activation during inhibitory or cognitive-control tasks, not during processing of standard interoceptive cues; the section also says direct assessments of interoceptive sensitivity in substance users were lacking. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredInteroceptive feelings are the primary positive and negative reinforcers perpetuating substance use disorders.
“Interoceptive feelings are the primary positive and negative reinforcers perpetuating substance use disorders (Paulus and Stewart, 2014).”
From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Paulus and Stewart, 2014
Section 1 describes drug use as seeking to feel better or avoid feeling worse and says body-relevant information may play an important role in addiction. Section 3 links interoception to reward and to aversive states that can motivate drug use. The paper does not establish that interoceptive feelings are the primary positive and negative reinforcers; it says their role needs further empirical validation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 153 · Cited by 281
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kim YT Song HJ Seo JH Lee JJ Lee J Kwon DH Yoo DS Lee HJ Suh KJ Chang Y 2011b The differences in neural network activity between methamphetamine abusers and healthy subjects performing an emotion-matching task: functional MRI study NMR Biomed 21472808
- Authors
- Paulus, M. P., & Stewart, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Paulus, Martin P.
- Venue
- Neuropharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 342-350
- ISSN
- 0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3858461
- OpenAlex
- W1999673284
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016663, P20 DA027834, R01DA018307, P20DA027843, R01DA027797)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- interoception, drug addiction, insula, cue reactivity, cognitive control, reward processing, stress, attention, approach-avoidance behavior, embodied experience, cognitive training, addiction treatment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Brain, Conditioning, Psychological, Humans, Reward, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review