The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex
Abstract
The hypothesis that prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in accurate predictions of episodic memory performance was tested using the feeling-of-knowing (FOK) paradigm. Fourteen patients with a broad spectrum of damage to the frontal cortex and matched controls read sentences and later were tested for recall memory, confidence judgments, and FOK accuracy using as cues the sentences with the final word missing. While frontal patients were impaired at recall and recognition memory, they were able to make accurate confidence judgments about their recall attempts. By contrast, as a group, the patients were markedly impaired in the accuracy of their prospective FOK judgments. Lesion analysis of frontal patients with clear FOK impairment revealed an overlapping region of damage in right medial prefrontal cortex. These findings provide functional and anatomical evidence for a dissociation between recall confidence and prospective memory monitoring and are discussed in terms of familiarity and access theories of FOK predictions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Possible anatomical substrates of metacognition have been investigated for several cognitive domains (exteroceptive perceptual performance, memory) but not for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.
“Turning to the neuroanatomy of metacognition, possible anatomical substrates have been investigated for several cognitive domains, in particular (extero)perceptual performance or memory (Shimamura and Squire, 1986; Schnyer et al., 2004; Fleming et al., 2010, 2012, 2014; McCurdy et al., 2013), but not, to our knowledge, for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Schnyer et al., 2004
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 175
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Partington, 1949, Partington’s pathway test, The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1, 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnyer, D. M., Verfaellie, M., Alexander, M. P., LaFleche, G., Nicholls, L., & Kaszniak, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schnyer, David M
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 957-966
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104712285
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- School of Medicine, Boston University
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH064004)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-26985, P50NS026985)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- feeling of knowing, frontal lobe lesions, episodic memory, memory confidence judgments, familiarity, access theory, memory monitoring, recognition memory, recall memory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Deja Vu, Female, Humans, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Random Allocation, Mental Recall, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review