Cited by 175Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex

Abstract

The hypothesis that prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in accurate predictions of episodic memory performance was tested using the feeling-of-knowing (FOK) paradigm. Fourteen patients with a broad spectrum of damage to the frontal cortex and matched controls read sentences and later were tested for recall memory, confidence judgments, and FOK accuracy using as cues the sentences with the final word missing. While frontal patients were impaired at recall and recognition memory, they were able to make accurate confidence judgments about their recall attempts. By contrast, as a group, the patients were markedly impaired in the accuracy of their prospective FOK judgments. Lesion analysis of frontal patients with clear FOK impairment revealed an overlapping region of damage in right medial prefrontal cortex. These findings provide functional and anatomical evidence for a dissociation between recall confidence and prospective memory monitoring and are discussed in terms of familiarity and access theories of FOK predictions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Possible anatomical substrates of metacognition have been investigated for several cognitive domains (exteroceptive perceptual performance, memory) but not for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.

    “Turning to the neuroanatomy of metacognition, possible anatomical substrates have been investigated for several cognitive domains, in particular (extero)perceptual performance or memory (Shimamura and Squire, 1986; Schnyer et al., 2004; Fleming et al., 2010, 2012, 2014; McCurdy et al., 2013), but not, to our knowledge, for interoception or homeostasis/allostasis.”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 175

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Partington, 1949, Partington’s pathway test, The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1, 9

Metadata

Authors
Schnyer, D. M., Verfaellie, M., Alexander, M. P., LaFleche, G., Nicholls, L., & Kaszniak, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Schnyer, David M
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
957-966
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104712285
Cited by
175
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Boston University
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH064004)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-26985, P50NS026985)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
feeling of knowing, frontal lobe lesions, episodic memory, memory confidence judgments, familiarity, access theory, memory monitoring, recognition memory, recall memory
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Injuries, Brain Mapping, Deja Vu, Female, Humans, Judgment, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Random Allocation, Mental Recall, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review