Cited by 377Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Choice selection and reward anticipation: an fMRI study

Abstract

We examined neural activations during decision-making using fMRI paired with the wheel of fortune task, a newly developed two-choice decision-making task with probabilistic monetary gains. In particular, we assessed the impact of high-reward/risk events relative to low-reward/risk events on neural activations during choice selection and during reward anticipation. Seventeen healthy adults completed the study. We found, in line with predictions, that (i) the selection phase predominantly recruited regions involved in visuo-spatial attention (occipito-parietal pathway), conflict (anterior cingulate), manipulation of quantities (parietal cortex), and preparation for action (premotor area), whereas the anticipation phase prominently recruited regions engaged in reward processes (ventral striatum); and (ii) high-reward/risk conditions relative to low-reward/risk conditions were associated with a greater neural response in ventral striatum during selection, though not during anticipation. Following an a priori ROI analysis focused on orbitofrontal cortex, we observed orbitofrontal cortex activation (BA 11 and 47) during selection (particularly to high-risk/reward options), and to a more limited degree, during anticipation. These findings support the notion that (1) distinct, although overlapping, pathways subserve the processes of selection and anticipation in a two-choice task of probabilistic monetary reward; (2) taking a risk and awaiting the consequence of a risky decision seem to affect neural activity differently in selection and anticipation; and thus (3) common structures, including the ventral striatum, are modulated differently by risk/reward during selection and anticipation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 377

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Buckner, 1998, Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response, NeuroImage, 6, 373

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Munson, S., Eshel, N., Zarahn, E., Leibenluft, E., Zametkin, A., Towbin, K., Blair, J., Charney, D., & Pine, D. S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
42
Issue
12
Pages
1585-1597
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022490111
Cited by
377
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
decision-making, reward anticipation, risk, ventral striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, visuospatial attention, action preparation, two-choice task
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Choice Behavior, Games, Experimental, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motivation, Reference Values, Reward, Thinking, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review