Cited by 134Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Delay Aversion in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: An empirical investigation of the broader phenotype

Bitsakou, Paraskevi, Psychogiou, Lamprini, Thompson, Margaret, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.·2009·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Background Delay-related motivational processes are impaired in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Here we explore the impact of ADHD on the performance of three putative indices of Delay Aversion (DAv): (i) the choice for immediate over delayed reward; (ii) slower reaction times following delay; and (iii) increased delay-related frustration-to see whether these tap into a common DAv construct that differentiates ADHD cases from controls and shows evidence of familiality.Method Seventy seven male and female individuals (age range 6-17) with a research diagnosis combined type ADHD, 65 of their siblings unaffected by ADHD and 50 non-ADHD controls completed three delay tasks.Results As predicted the size of the correlation between tasks was small but a common latent component was apparent. Children with ADHD differed from controls on all tasks (d=.4-.7) and on an overall DAv index (d=.9): The battery as a whole demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity. In general, deficits were equally marked in childhood and adolescence and were independent of comorbid ODD. IQ moderated the effect on the MIDA. Scores on the DAv factor co-segregated within ADHD families.Discussion There is value in exploring the broader DAv phenotype in ADHD. The results illustrate the power of multivariate approaches to endophenotypes. By highlighting the significant, but limited, role of DAv in ADHD these results are consistent with recent accounts that emphasize neuropsychological heterogeneity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 134

Authors
Bitsakou, P., Psychogiou, L., Thompson, M., & Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J.S.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
446-456
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993903183
Cited by
134
References
76
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, delay aversion, endophenotypes, delay discounting, reaction time, frustration, familiality, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Intelligence Tests, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenotype, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Reward, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review