Cited by 159Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

Sex differences in the brain response to affective scenes with or without humans

Proverbio, Alice Mado, Adorni, Roberta, Zani, Alberto, Trestianu, Laura·2009·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Recent findings have demonstrated that women might be more reactive than men to viewing painful stimuli (vicarious response to pain), and therefore more empathic [Han, S., Fan, Y., & Mao, L. (2008). Gender difference in empathy for pain: An electrophysiological investigation. Brain Research, 1196, 85-93]. We investigated whether the two sexes differed in their cerebral responses to affective pictures portraying humans in different positive or negative contexts compared to natural or urban scenarios. 440 IAPS slides were presented to 24 Italian students (12 women and 12 men). Half the pictures displayed humans while the remaining scenes lacked visible persons. ERPs were recorded from 128 electrodes and swLORETA (standardized weighted Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography) source reconstruction was performed. Occipital P115 was greater in response to persons than to scenes and was affected by the emotional valence of the human pictures. This suggests that processing of biologically relevant stimuli is prioritized. Orbitofrontal N2 was greater in response to positive than negative human pictures in women but not in men, and not to scenes. A late positivity (LP) to suffering humans far exceeded the response to negative scenes in women but not in men. In both sexes, the contrast suffering-minus-happy humans revealed a difference in the activation of the occipito/temporal, right occipital (BA19), bilateral parahippocampal, left dorsal prefrontal cortex (DPFC) and left amygdala. However, increased right amygdala and right frontal area activities were observed only in women. The humans-minus-scenes contrast revealed a difference in the activation of the middle occipital gyrus (MOG) in men, and of the left inferior parietal (BA40), left superior temporal gyrus (STG, BA38) and right cingulate (BA31) in women (270-290 ms). These data indicate a sex-related difference in the brain response to humans, possibly supporting human empathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Static images may be effective in eliciting putative MNS activity if the images contain implied movement.

    “static images may be effective in eliciting putative MNS activity if images used contain implied movement (dynamic information within static images, or 'implicit motion'; Proverbio et al., 2009; Urgesi et al., 2006).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 159

Authors
Proverbio, A. M., Adorni, R., Zani, A., & Trestianu, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IT)
Corresponding author
Proverbio, Alice Mado
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
47
Issue
12
Pages
2374-2388
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133595197
Cited by
159
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
sex differences, emotional pictures, human face, empathy, emotional valence, p115, N2, late positive potential, amygdala, parahippocampal cortex, dorsal prefrontal cortex, occipital cortex, International Affective Picture System, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review