The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of hemispheric specialization for linguistic and emotional prosodic perception: A meta-analysis of the lesion literature
Abstract
It is unclear whether there is hemispheric specialization for prosodic perception and, if so, what the nature of this hemispheric asymmetry is. Using the lesion-approach, many studies have attempted to test whether there is hemispheric specialization for emotional and linguistic prosodic perception by examining the impact of left vs. right hemispheric damage on prosodic perception task performance. However, so far no consensus has been reached. In an attempt to find a consistent pattern of lateralization for prosodic perception, a meta-analysis was performed on 38 lesion studies (including 450 left hemisphere damaged patients, 534 right hemisphere damaged patients and 491 controls) of prosodic perception. It was found that both left and right hemispheric damage compromise emotional and linguistic prosodic perception task performance. Furthermore, right hemispheric damage degraded emotional prosodic perception more than left hemispheric damage (trimmed g=-0.37, 95% CI [-0.66; -0.09], N=620 patients). It is concluded that prosodic perception is under bihemispheric control with relative specialization of the right hemisphere for emotional prosodic perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, seven meta-analyses comprised studies with high (>90%) average power 24,26,31,57,63,68,71 .”
From Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641
Dorsal and Ventral Pathways for Prosody
Sammler, D., Grosbras, M., Anwander, A., Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., & Belin, P. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.009 · Cited by 284
The overlapping relationship between emotion perception and theory of mind
Mitchell, R. L. C., & Phillips, L. H. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.018 · Cited by 262
Intonational speech prosody encoding in the human auditory cortex
Tang, C., Hamilton, L. S., & Chang, E. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam8577 · Cited by 161
Perception of affective and linguistic prosody: an ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
Belyk, M., & Brown, S. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst124 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Witteman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., van de Velde, D., van Heuven, V. J. J. P., & Schiller, N. O.
- Affiliations
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Witteman, Jurriaan
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 3722-3738
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080927087
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- hemispheric lateralization, prosodic perception, emotional prosody, linguistic prosody, right hemisphere damage, left hemisphere damage, brain lesions
- MeSH terms
- Brain Injuries, Dominance, Cerebral, Emotions, Humans, Linguistics, Perception, Speech Perception, Databases, Factual
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
