Cited by 130Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsAction Observation and Synchronization

Full body action remapping of peripersonal space: The case of walking

Open access
Noel, Jean-Paul, Grivaz, Petr, Marmaroli, Patrick, Lissek, Herve, Blanke, Olaf, Serino, Andrea·2015·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The space immediately surrounding the body, i.e. peripersonal space (PPS), is represented by populations of multisensory neurons, from a network of premotor and parietal areas, which integrate tactile stimuli from the body's surface with visual or auditory stimuli presented within a limited distance from the body. Here we show that PPS boundaries extend while walking. We used an audio-tactile interaction task to identify the location in space where looming sounds affect reaction time to tactile stimuli on the chest, taken as a proxy of the PPS boundary. The task was administered while participants either stood still or walked on a treadmill. In addition, in two separate experiments, subjects either received or not additional visual inputs, i.e. optic flow, implying a translation congruent with the direction of their walking. Results revealed that when participants were standing still, sounds boosted tactile processing when located within 65-100 cm from the participants' body, but not at farther distances. Instead, when participants were walking PPS expands as reflected in boosted tactile processing at ~1.66 m. This was found despite the fact the spatial relationship between the participant's body and the sound's source did not vary between the Standing and the Walking condition. This expansion effect on PPS boundaries due to walking was the same with or without optic flow, suggesting that kinematics and proprioceptive cues, rather than visual cues, are critical in triggering…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ongoing, fast modulations of PPS representations have been reported during motion or in the presence of other individuals.

    “have also been reported during motion (Berger, Neumann, & Gail, 2019;Noel, Grivaz, et al., 2015), or in the presence of other individuals”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Noel, Grivaz, et al., 2015

  • Illusory or real changes in body dimensions, or body position in space, may change PPS representation.

    “As such, illusory or real changes in body dimensions, or body position in space may change PPS representation (Berger et al., 2019;Cardini, Fatemi-Ghomi, Gajewska-Knapik, Gooch, & Aspell, 2019;D'Angelo et al., 2017;Noel, Grivaz, et al., 2015;Pfeiffer, Noel, Serino, & Blanke, 2018).”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Noel, Grivaz, et al., 2015

  • The interaction between PPS representation and the premotor system is dynamic and bidirectional, as movements like grasping or walking can induce adaptations in PPS extension around the body parts involved.

    “This interaction is dynamic and bidirectional, as evidenced by the fact that movements like grasping or walking can induce adaptations in PPS extension around the body parts involved in those movements (Brozzoli et al. 2009, 2010; Noel et al. 2015)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 93 · Cited by 130

Authors
Noel, J.-P., Grivaz, P., Marmaroli, P., Lissek, H., Blanke, O., & Serino, A.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Serino, Andrea
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
70
Pages
375-384
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985578091
Cited by
130
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Fondation Bertarelli
  • Volkswagen Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CRSII1_125135/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
peripersonal space, walking, multisensory integration, looming sounds, tactile processing, optical flow, proprioception, body movement, treadmill walking
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Personal Space, Reaction Time, Sound, Sound Localization, Space Perception, Walking, Young Adult, Optic Flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review