Visual abilities are important for auditory-only speech recognition: evidence from autism spectrum disorder
Abstract
In auditory-only conditions, for example when we listen to someone on the phone, it is essential to fast and accurately recognize what is said (speech recognition). Previous studies have shown that speech recognition performance in auditory-only conditions is better if the speaker is known not only by voice, but also by face. Here, we tested the hypothesis that such an improvement in auditory-only speech recognition depends on the ability to lip-read. To test this we recruited a group of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a condition associated with difficulties in lip-reading, and typically developed controls. All participants were trained to identify six speakers by name and voice. Three speakers were learned by a video showing their face and three others were learned in a matched control condition without face. After training, participants performed an auditory-only speech recognition test that consisted of sentences spoken by the trained speakers. As a control condition, the test also included speaker identity recognition on the same auditory material. The results showed that, in the control group, performance in speech recognition was improved for speakers known by face in comparison to speakers learned in the matched control condition without face. The ASD group lacked such a performance benefit. For the ASD group auditory-only speech recognition was even worse for speakers known by face compared to speakers not known by face. In speaker identity recognition, the ASD group performed worse than the control group independent of whether the speakers were learned with or without face. Two additional visual experiments showed that the ASD group performed worse in lip-reading whereas face identity recognition was within the normal range. The findings support the view that auditory-only communication involves specific visual mechanisms. Further, they indicate that in ASD, speaker-specific dynamic visual information is not available to optimize auditory-only speech recognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While listening to auditory speech, individuals with ASD struggle to integrate previous exposure to speaker-specific facial information to optimize auditory speech recognition.
“While listening to auditory speech, individuals with ASD struggle to integrate previous exposure to speaker-specific facial information to optimize auditory speech recognition (Schelinski et al., 2014).”
From The impact of atypical sensory processing on social impairments in autism spectrum disorder (2018) · cites this paper as Schelinski et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Schelinski, S., Riedel, P., & von Kriegstein, K.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schelinski, Stefanie
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986630807
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max Planck Research Group
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, lip reading, face identification, speaker recognition, voice familiarity, multisensory integration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Face, Female, Humans, Lipreading, Male, Speech Perception, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review