Using future thinking to reduce temporal discounting: under what circumstances are the medial temporal lobes critical?
Open accessAbstract
The capacity to envision the future plays an important role in many aspects of cognition, including our ability to make optimal, adaptive choices. Past work has shown that the medial temporal lobe (MTL) is necessary for decisions that draw on episodic future thinking. By contrast, little is known about the role of the MTL in decisions that draw on semantic future thinking. Accordingly, the present study investigated whether the MTL contributes to one form of decision making, namely intertemporal choice, when such decisions depend on semantic consideration of the future. In an intertemporal choice task, participants must select either a smaller amount of money that is available in the present or a larger amount of money that would be available at a future date. Amnesic individuals with MTL damage and healthy control participants performed such a task in which, prior to making a choice, they engaged in a semantic generation exercise, wherein they generated items that they would purchase with the future reward. In experiment 1, we found that, relative to a baseline condition involving standard intertemporal choice, healthy individuals were more inclined to select a larger, later reward over a smaller, present reward after engaging in semantic future thinking. By contrast, amnesic participants were paradoxically less inclined to wait for a future reward following semantic future thinking. This finding suggests that amnesics may have had difficulty "tagging" the generated item(s) as belonging to the future. Critically, experiment 2 showed that when the generated items were presented alongside the intertemporal choices, both controls and amnesic participants shifted to more patient choices. These findings suggest that the MTL is not needed for making optimal decisions that draw on semantic future thinking as long as scaffolding is provided to support accurate time tagging. Together, these findings stand to better clarify the role of the MTL in decision making.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contradictory result may have occurred because amnesic patients could have benefited from mere semantic rather than episodic future thinking.
“This outcome may have occurred because in the latter study (79), amnesics could have benefited from mere semantic (rather than episodic) future thinking (see also 80).”
From Episodic Future Thinking: Mechanisms and Functions (2017) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wechsler D Wechsler Memory Scale—Third Edition (WMS–III) administration and scoring manual 1997b The Psychological Corporation San Antonio, TX
- Authors
- Palombo, D. J., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Palombo, D.J.
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 437-444
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5073810
- OpenAlex
- W2472982715
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Mental Health (MH093431)
- Clinical Science Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (IO1 CX000925)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- medial temporal lobe, delay discounting, intertemporal choice, episodic future thinking, amnesia, semantic generation, time tagging, decision-making, delay of gratification
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amnesia, Analysis of Variance, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Temporal Lobe, Thinking, Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed, Delay Discounting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review