Should I trust you? Learning and memory of social interactions in dementia
Open accessAbstract
Social relevance has an enhancing effect on learning and subsequent memory retrieval. The ability to learn from and remember social interactions may impact on susceptibility to financial exploitation, which is elevated in individuals with dementia. The current study aimed to investigate learning and memory of social interactions, the relationship between performance and financial vulnerability and the neural substrates underpinning performance in 14 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 20 behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) patients and 20 age-matched healthy controls. On a "trust game" task, participants invested virtual money with counterparts who acted either in a trustworthy or untrustworthy manner over repeated interactions. A non-social "lottery" condition was also included. Participants' learning of trust/distrust responses and subsequent memory for the counterparts and nature of the interactions was assessed. Carer-rated profiles of financial vulnerability were also collected. Relative to controls, both patient groups showed attenuated learning of trust/distrust responses, and lower overall memory for social interactions. Despite poor learning performance, both AD and bvFTD patients showed better memory of social compared to non-social interactions. Importantly, better memory for social interactions was associated with lower financial vulnerability in AD, but not bvFTD. Learning and memory of social interactions was associated with medial temporal and temporoparietal atrophy in AD, whereas a wider network of frontostriatal, insular, fusiform and medial temporal regions was implicated in bvFTD. Our findings suggest that although social relevance influences memory to an extent in both AD and bvFTD, this is associated with vulnerability to financial exploitation in AD only, and is underpinned by changes to different neural substrates. Theoretically, these findings provide novel insights into potential mechanisms that give rise to vulnerability in people with dementia, and open avenues for possible interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Growing evidence shows that tests of ventromedial prefrontal cortex function (such as error sensitivity, verbal fluency, inhibition, and decision-making and neuroeconomics derived tasks) are more sensitive than dorsolateral prefrontal tests (such as cognitive control and attention).
“Importantly, growing evidence shows that tests of ventromedial prefrontal cortex function (such as error sensitivity, 33 verbal fluency, 33 inhibition, 34 and decisionmaking and neuroeconomics derived tasks 35 ) are more sensitive than dorsolateral prefrontal tests (such as cognitive control and attention).33”
From Advances and controversies in frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, biomarkers, and therapeutic considerations (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]11. Castel, A. D., Balota, D. A., McCabe, D. P., & Castel, A. (2008). Aging, memory efficiency and the strategic control of attention at encoding: Selective impairments of value-directed remembering in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0014888 · DOI
- [88]88. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -Third Edition (WAIS-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
- Authors
- Wong, S., Irish, M., O’Callaghan, C., Kumfor, F., Savage, G., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Hornberger, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders (AU)
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hornberger, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuropsychologia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 104
- Pages
- 157-167
- ISSN
- 0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2750065163
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk
- Locations
- Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1037746)
- Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Program (CE11000102)
- Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship
- ARC Future Fellowship (FT160100096)
- NHMRC Neil Hamilton Fairley Fellowship (APP1091310)
- NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship (APP1097026)
- NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (APP1103258)
- Alzheimer's Research UK
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- dementia, Alzheimer's disease, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, social learning, social memory, economic violence, financial vulnerability, trust game, social relevance, medial temporal lobe atrophy, fronto-striatal network, insula, fusiform cortex, neural correlates
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Dementia, Female, Games, Experimental, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Case-Control Studies, Trust
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review