Cited by 16Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Childhood socioeconomic status predicts cognitive outcomes across adulthood following traumatic brain injury

Open access
Cohen-Zimerman, Shira, Kachian, Zachary R., Krueger, Frank, Gordon, Barry, Grafman, Jordan·2019·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Objective To examine the association between childhood socioeconomic status (SES) and the level and rate of change in intelligence scores throughout adulthood following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods In this longitudinal study we tested 186 patients with TBI and 54 healthy controls from the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Childhood SES was determined for each participant based on parental educational attainment and occupational prestige. General intelligence was initially assessed pre-injury upon induction into the military, and again 15, 35 and 40+ years post-injury. We examined whether childhood SES, total brain volume loss and lesion laterality can predict post-injury intelligence scores and the rate of change in those scores between study phases. Results For both participants with and without TBI, childhood SES accounted for a significant portion of the variance in intelligence scores pre-injury and in all three post-injury evaluations, however, it was not associated with the rate of cognitive change. Lastly, childhood SES predicted cognitive outcome among patients with left hemisphere damage better than it did for right hemisphere damage patients. Conclusions These findings provide the first evidence indicating the persistent effects of childhood SES on intelligence scores later in adulthood following a TBI. Childhood SES should be considered when predicting and assessing cognitive recovery following TBI, even when the injury occurred in adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent evidence suggests that the interaction between SES and biological variables (e.g. side of hemispheric injury, genomics, neural imaging) may contribute to the relationship between SES and cognition.

    “While the association of SES with cognition has been well studied, recent evidence suggests that the interaction between SES and biological variables (e.g. side of hemispheric injury, genomics, neural imaging) may contribute to this relationship (Cohen-Zimerman et al., 2019; Noble et al., 2012; Raizada et al., 2008; Schneider et al., 2024; Shi et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen-Zimerman, S., Kachian, Z. R., Krueger, F., Gordon, B., & Grafman, J.
Affiliations
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
124
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907023615
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-11-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smart Family Foundation
  • Julius N. Frankel Foundation
  • Therapeutic Cognitive Neuroscience
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
childhood socioeconomic status, traumatic brain injury, intelligence, cognitive recovery, brain atrophy, lesion laterality, left hemisphere damage, right hemisphere damage, parental education, occupational prestige
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Brain, Humans, Intelligence, Functional Laterality, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review