Vasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bond formation in the monogamous prairie vole
Abstract
Arginine vasopressin and its V1a receptor subtype (V1aR) are critical for pair bond formation between adult prairie voles. However, it is unclear which brain circuits are involved in this vasopressin-mediated facilitation of pair bond formation. Here, we examined mating-induced Fos expression in several brain regions involved in sociosexual and reward circuitry in male prairie voles. Consistent with studies in other species, Fos expression was induced in several regions known to be involved in sociosexual behavior, namely, the medial amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and medial preoptic area. Fos induction also occurred in limbic and reward regions, including the ventral pallidum, nucleus accumbens, and mediodorsal thalamus (MDthal). Next, we infused a selective V1aR antagonist into three candidate brain regions that seemed most likely involved in vasopressin-mediated pair bond formation: the ventral pallidum, medial amygdala, and MDthal. Blockade of V1aR in the ventral pallidum, but not in the medial amygdala or MDthal, prevented partner preference formation. Lastly, we demonstrated that the mating-induced Fos activation in the ventral pallidum was vasopressin-dependent, since over-expression of V1aR using viral vector gene transfer resulted in a proportionate increase in mating-induced Fos in the same region. This is the first study to show that vasopressin neurotransmission occurs in the ventral pallidum during mating, and that V1aR activation in this region is necessary for pair bond formation in male prairie voles. The results from this study have profound implications for the neural circuitry underlying social attachment and generate novel hypotheses regarding the neural control of social behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In male prairie voles, infusion of a vasopressin antagonist into ventral pallidum prevents partner preference formation.
“Conversely, the infusion of an AVP antagonist into the ventral pallidum of male prairie voles prevents partner preference formation (9).”
From Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner (2013) · cites this paper as [9]
Oxytocin is primarily responsible for pair-bonding in female voles, while arginine vasopressin is responsible for pair-bonding in males.
“OT is primarily responsible for pair-bonding in female voles, with the related peptide arginine vasopressin (AVP) responsible for pair-bonding in males (3,30–33).”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
In prairie voles, oxytocin has extensive sex-specific effects, although in both sexes it is intimately involved in social behavior.
“In prairie voles, OT has been shown to have extensive sex-specific effects, although in both sexes it is intimately involved in social behavior.”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
Blocking vasopressin V1a receptors in the ventral pallidum or lateral septum with antagonists prevents partner preference formation following mating.
“Specifically, blocking vasopressin V1a receptors (AVP1A) in the ventral pallidum or lateral septum with antagonists prevents partner preference formation following mating [20, 21].”
From The prairie vole: An emerging model organism for understanding the social brain (2010) · cites this paper as [20]
There is abundant evidence to suggest that AVP neural circuits are crucial to pair bonding in male prairie voles.
“In addition to the role of OXT in the modulation of social behavior between pair-mates, there is abundant evidence to suggest that AVP neural circuits are crucial to pair bonding in male prairie voles (Lim and Young, 2004; Young et al., 2011).”
From Marmosets treated with oxytocin are more socially attractive to their long-term mate (2015) · cites this paper as Lim and Young, 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 322
- Authors
- Lim, M. M., & Young, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, M.M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-45
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988871163
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 24.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-64692, K02MH064692, F30MH065050, MH 56897, MH65050)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-00 165, P51RR000165)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Keywords
- vasopressin, V1a receptor, pair bonding, Microtus ochrogaster, mate preferences, ventral pallidum, medial amygdala, mediodorsal thalamus, Fos expression, mating behavior, social attachment, reward systems, sociosexual behavior, V1a receptor antagonist
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Arvicolinae, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Pair Bond, Vasopressins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Receptors, Vasopressin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review