Cited by 161Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Progesterone increases oligodendroglial cell proliferation in rat cerebellar slice cultures

Ghoumari, A.M., Baulieu, E.E., Schumacher, M.·2005·Neuroscience

Abstract

We have previously demonstrated that progesterone significantly increases the rate of myelination in organotypic slice cultures of 7-day-old rat and mouse cerebellum. Here, we show that progesterone (20microM) stimulates the proliferation of oligodendrocyte precursors in cultured cerebellar slices of 7-day-old rats. The steroid increased the number of pre-oligodendrocytes (NG2(+), O4(+)) and to some extent of oligodendrocyte precursors, corresponding to an earlier developmental stage (nestin(+), PDGFalphaR(+), NG2(+), O4(-)). Progesterone stimulated the proliferation of both NG2(+) and O4(+) cells as shown by increased double-immunolabeling with the cell proliferation marker Ki67. The mitogenic effect of progesterone was inhibited by the progesterone receptor antagonist mifepristone (10microM) and could not be mimicked by its GABA-active metabolite 3alpha,5alpha-tetrahydroprogesterone (allopregnanolone), even at the high concentration of 50microM. Results indicate that progesterone first strongly and transiently stimulates the proliferation of oligodendrocyte precursors, and that it may thereafter accelerate their maturation into myelinating oligodendrocytes. Although oligodendrocyte precursors may be a direct target for the actions of progesterone, their number may also be indirectly influenced by the effects of the steroid on neurons and microglial cells, since treatment of the cerebellar slices with progesterone enhanced staining of the neuronal cytoskeleton marker microtu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 161

Authors
Ghoumari, A. M., Baulieu, E. E., & Schumacher, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
135
Issue
1
Pages
47-58
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997026847
Cited by
161
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
progesterone, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, cell proliferation, myelination, cerebellum, mifepristone, allopregnanolone, progesterone receptor, microglia, MAP2, Ki-67, oligodendrocyte maturation
MeSH terms
Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4, Animals, Antigens, Cell Count, Cerebellum, Cytoskeleton, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Hormone Antagonists, Immunohistochemistry, Intermediate Filament Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Oligodendroglia, Organ Culture Techniques, Progesterone, Proteoglycans, Receptors, Progesterone, Mifepristone, Cell Lineage, Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha, Cell Proliferation, Rats, Nestin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review