Cited by 65Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Repeated administration of imipramine attenuates glutamatergic transmission in rat frontal cortex

Tokarski, K., Bobula, B., Wabno, J., Hess, G.·2008·Neuroscience

Abstract

The effects of repeated administration of a tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, lasting 14 days (10 mg/kg p.o., twice daily), were studied ex vivo in rat frontal cortex slices prepared 48 h after last dose of the drug. In slices prepared from imipramine-treated animals the mean frequency, and to a lesser degree the mean amplitude, of spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents recorded from layer II/III pyramidal neurons, were decreased. These effects were accompanied by a reduction of the initial slope ratio of pharmacologically isolated N-methyl-D-aspartate to AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated stimulation-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents. Imipramine treatment also resulted in a decrease of extracellular field potentials evoked in layer II/III by stimulation of underlying sites in layer V. These results indicate that chronic treatment with imipramine results in an attenuation of the release of glutamate and an alteration in the postsynaptic reactivity of ionotropic glutamate receptors in rat cerebral cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.03.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antidepressants are believed to exert one of their therapeutic effects by modulating the extracellular availability of glutamate.

    “Interestingly, antidepressants are believed to exert one of the therapeutic effects by modulating the extracellular availability of this neurotransmitter [122,123,124,125].”

    From P2X7 Receptor Signaling in Stress and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as [125]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 65

Authors
Tokarski, K., Bobula, B., Wabno, J., & Hess, G.
Affiliations
  • Maj Institute of Pharmacology (PL)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
Corresponding author
Hess, G.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
789-795
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087467518
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
imipramine, chronic antidepressant treatment, glutamatergic neurotransmission, frontal cortex, excitatory postsynaptic currents, NMDA receptor, non-NMDA receptors, ionotropic glutamate receptors, glutamate release, pyramidal neurons, field potentials, tricyclic antidepressants
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Frontal Lobe, Imipramine, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Organ Culture Techniques, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, AMPA, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Glutamic Acid, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review