Cited by 91Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Temporal-spatial expression and novel biochemical properties of the memory-related protein KIBRA

Johannsen, S., Duning, K., Pavenstädt, H., Kremerskothen, J., Boeckers, T.M.·2008·Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability of the mammalian brain to store and recall information is based on synaptic plasticity due to constant remodeling of synaptic contacts. Although various classes of proteins such as neurotransmitter receptors, cytoskeletal components and protein kinases were already identified as modulators of memory formation, their specific interactions and crosstalks are still poorly understood. Genetic variants of the scaffolding protein KIBRA (kidney brain) a substrate of the memory-related protein kinase C zeta and component of the neuronal cytoskeleton, were recently shown to be associated with human memory performance. However, the function of KIBRA on the cellular and physiological level is still unclear. To gain more insights into the temporal and spatial expression of KIBRA, we performed in situ hybridization assays and immunohistological staining of human and rodent (rat) brain. Our data demonstrate that KIBRA is mainly expressed in memory-related regions of the brain (hippocampus, cortex) but is also found in the cerebellum and the hypothalamus. In primary hippocampal neurons, KIBRA displays a somatodendritic distribution and an enrichment at the postsynaptic density. Binding studies further show that KIBRA is able to form head-to-tail homodimers and that dimerization is mediated by the internal C2-like domain. Our data indicate that KIBRA is involved in brain development and memory formation as a postsynaptic scaffold protein connecting cytoskeletal and signaling molecules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 91

Authors
Johannsen, S., Duning, K., Pavenstädt, H., Kremerskothen, J., & Boeckers, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University Hospital Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Kremerskothen, J.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
155
Issue
4
Pages
1165-1173
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021994354
Cited by
91
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
KIBRA, memory formation, synaptic plasticity, postsynaptic scaffold proteins, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, homodimerization, postsynaptic density, brain development, protein kinase C zeta, neuronal cytoskeleton, brain gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Cell Line, Transformed, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Transfection, Gene Expression, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Two-Hybrid System Techniques, Immunoprecipitation, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review