Cited by 42Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Species-specific distributions of tyrosine hydroxylase–immunoreactive neurons in the prefrontal cortex of anthropoid primates

Open access
Raghanti, M.A., Spocter, M.A., Stimpson, C.D., Erwin, J.M., Bonar, C.J., Allman, J.M., Hof, P.R., Sherwood, C.C.·2009·Neuroscience

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the distribution of cortical neurons immunoreactive for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in prefrontal cortical regions of humans and nonhuman primate species. Immunohistochemical methods were used to visualize TH-immunoreactive (TH-ir) neurons in areas 9 (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and 32 (anterior paracingulate cortex). The study sample included humans, great apes (chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, orangutan), one lesser ape (siamang), and Old World monkeys (golden guenon, patas monkey, olive baboon, moor macaque, black and white colobus, and François' langur). The percentage of neurons within the cortex expressing TH was quantified using computer-assisted stereology. TH-ir neurons were present in layers V and VI and the subjacent white matter in each of the Old World monkey species, the siamang, and in humans. TH-ir cells were also occasionally observed in layer III of human, siamang, baboon, colobus, and François' langur cortex. Cortical cells expressing TH were notably absent in each of the great ape species. Quantitative analyses did not reveal a phylogenetic trend for percentage of TH-ir neurons in these cortical areas among species. Interestingly, humans and monkey species exhibited a bilaminar pattern of TH-ir axon distributions within prefrontal regions, with layers I-II and layers V-VI having the densest contingent of axons. In contrast, the great apes had a different pattern of laminar innervation, with a remarkably denser distribution of TH-ir axons within layer III. It is possible that the catecholaminergic afferent input to layer III in chimpanzees and other great apes covaries with loss of TH-ir cells within the cortical mantle.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.058

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of TH increase in transgenic mice likely reflects the low homology between the promoter regions of the mouse and human TH genes and differences in gene regulation.

    “This likely reflects the low homology between the promoter regions of the mouse and human TH genes and differences in gene regulation27,28.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aboitiz F, Garcia GL. The evolutionary origin of language areas in the human brain. Brain Res Rev 1997;25:381-396. [PubMed: 9495565]
  2. Hof PR, Ungerleider LG, Webster MJ, Gattass R, Adams MM, Sailstad CA, Morrison JH. Neurofilament protein is differentially distributed in subpopulations of corticocortical projection neurons in the macaque monkey visual pathways. J Comp Neurol 1996;376:112-127. [PubMed: 8946287]

Authors
Raghanti, M. A., Spocter, M. A., Stimpson, C. D., Erwin, J. M., Bonar, C. J., Allman, J. M., Hof, P. R., & Sherwood, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (US)
  • Cleveland Metroparks Zoo (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (US)
Corresponding author
Raghanti, M.A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
158
Issue
4
Pages
1551-1559
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982528263
Cited by
42
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0515484, 0549117)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation (22002078)
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
  • Northwestern University (AG13854)
  • National Institutes of Health (AG13854, AG14308)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG13854, R44AG014308, P30AG013854)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS42867, R01NS042867)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
tyrosine hydroxylase, catecholaminergic neurons, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, great apes, Old World monkeys, siamang, human, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, layer III, phylogenetic variation, stereology
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Phylogeny, Primates, Species Specificity, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review