Angiogenesis but not neurogenesis is critical for normal learning and memory acquisition.
Abstract
Aerobic exercise has been well established to promote enhanced learning and memory in both human and non-human animals. Exercise regimens enhance blood perfusion, neo-vascularization, and neurogenesis in nervous system structures associated with learning and memory. The impact of specific plastic changes to learning and memory performance in exercising animals are not well understood. The current experiment was designed to investigate the contributions of angiogenesis and neurogenesis to learning and memory performance by pharmacologically blocking each process in separate groups of exercising animals prior to visual spatial memory assessment. Results from our experiment indicate that angiogenesis is an important component of learning as animals receiving an angiogenesis inhibitor exhibit retarded Morris water maze (MWM) acquisition. Interestingly, our results also revealed that neurogenesis inhibition improves learning and memory performance in the MWM. Animals that received the neurogenesis inhibitor displayed the best overall MWM performance. These results point to the importance of vascular plasticity in learning and memory function and provide empirical evidence to support the use of manipulations that enhance vascular plasticity to improve cognitive function and protect against natural cognitive decline.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some animal models have suggested that angiogenesis may underlie improvements in spatial memory tasks independent of other neuroplastic mechanisms.
“For example, some animal models have suggested that angiogenesis may underlie improvements in spatial memory tasks independent of other neuroplastic mechanisms (van Praag et al., 2007; Kerr et al., 2010), whereas others have found improvements in spatial learning to be driven by neurogenesis with no influence at all from angiogenesis (van Praag et al., 2005).”
From Aerobic Exercise as a Tool to Improve Hippocampal Plasticity and Function in Humans: Practical Implications for Mental Health Treatment (2016) · cites this paper as Kerr et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Kerr, A. L., Steuer, E. L., Pochtarev, V., & Swain, R. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 214-226
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012522816
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- angiogenesis, neurogenesis, learning and memory, aerobic exercise, angiogenesis inhibitors, vascular plasticity, spatial memory, Morris water maze, cognitive decline, blood perfusion, neovascularization
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Bromodeoxyuridine, Cell Count, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Indoles, Male, Memory, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Psychomotor Performance, Pyrroles, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Zidovudine, Maze Learning, Neovascularization, Physiologic, Rats, Long-Evans, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Receptor, Endothelin A, Rats, Neurogenesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review