Stress, anxiety, and dendritic spines: What are the connections?
Abstract
Stressful life events, especially those that induce fear, can produce a state of anxiety that is useful for avoiding similar fearful and potentially dangerous situations in the future. However, they can also lead to exaggerated states, which over time can produce mental illness. These changing states of readiness versus illness are thought to be regulated, at least in part, by alterations in dendritic and synaptic structure within brain regions known to be involved in anxiety. These regions include the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. In this article, we review the reciprocal relationships between the expression of stress- and anxiety-related behaviors and stress-induced morphological plasticity as detected by changes in dendrites and spines in these three brain regions. We begin by highlighting the acute and chronic effects of stress on synaptic morphology in each area and describe some of the putative mechanisms that have been implicated in these effects. We then discuss the functional consequences of stress-induced structural plasticity focusing on synaptic plasticity as well as cognitive and emotional behaviors. Finally, we consider how these structural changes may contribute to adaptive behaviors as well as maladaptive responses associated with anxiety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stress can influence the number of excitatory synapses on dendritic spines already within hours in brain regions including the hippocampus.
“Stress has been shown to influence the number of excitatory synapses on dendritic spines already within hours26,40 in brain regions including the hippocampus.34,41,42”
From Preferential loss of dorsal-hippocampus synapses underlies memory impairments provoked by short, multimodal stress (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 151 · Cited by 284
- Authors
- Leuner, B., & Shors, T. J.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leuner, B.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 251
- Pages
- 108-119
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085033756
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 151
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R0084148)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-59970, R00MH084148, R01MH059970)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- stress, anxiety, dendritic spines, synaptic plasticity, structural plasticity, amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, fear, chronic stress, maladaptive stress response
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Hippocampus, Humans, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Stress, Physiological, Stress, Psychological, Prefrontal Cortex, Dendritic Spines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review