Is it all in the family? The effects of early social structure on neural-behavioral systems of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Open accessAbstract
The transition to parenthood is generally associated with a reduction in anxiety or anxiety-like behavior across a wide range of species. In some species, juveniles provide supplementary parental care for younger siblings, a behavior known as alloparenting. Although the fitness consequences of alloparenting behavior have been a focus of evolutionary research, less is known about how alloparenting behavior impacts affective states. In the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), most juveniles exhibit alloparenting behavior, making the species an ideal model for examining the effects of alloparenting on future behavioral outcomes. We randomly assigned juvenile voles to alloparenting (AL) or no alloparenting (NoAL) groups and behaviorally phenotyped them for anxiety-like and social behaviors using the elevated plus maze (EPM), open field test (OFT), startle box, social interaction test, juvenile affiliation test, and partner preference test. AL voles displayed more anxiety-like and less exploratory behaviors than NoAL voles, spending significantly less time in the open arms of the EPM and center of an open field. We dissected the CA1 region of the hippocampus and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) from brains of behaviorally phenotyped voles and nontested siblings as well. Decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in CA1 has generally been associated with increased anxiety-like behavior in other rodents, while an anxiogenic role for BDNF in BNST is less established. Western blot analyses showed that alloparenting experience increased expression of BDNF in the BNST but decreased BDNF expression in the CA1 region of hippocampus (CA1) of nontested voles. There were similar differences in BNST BDNF of behaviorally phenotyped voles, and BDNF levels within this region were negatively correlated with exploratory behavior (i.e. time in center of OFT). Our results suggest that BDNF signaling in BNST and CA1 fluctuate with alloparenting experience, and they contribute to an increasingly complex "BDNF hypothesis" in which behavioral effects of this molecule are region-specific.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Developmental treatments can have particular ramifications to receptor binding and up- or down-regulation of peptide production.
“Developmental treatments can have particular ramifications to receptor binding and up- or down-regulation of peptide production (38,54,74,75).”
From Chronic intranasal oxytocin causes long-term impairments in partner preference formation in male prairie voles (2013) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 24
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Russell A Koenig W Dickinson J Mammals: comparisons & contrasts Ecology of Cooperative breeding birds 2004 vol. II Cambridge University Press 210 227
- Authors
- Greenberg, G. D., van Westerhuyzen, J. A., Bales, K. L., & Trainor, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greenberg, G.D.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 216
- Pages
- 46-56
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3397474
- OpenAlex
- W2035407063
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085069, R01MH073022, T32 MH82174-3, R21MH090392, T32MH082174)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD060117, HD060117)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- alloparenting, Microtus ochrogaster, anxiety-like behavior, social monogamy, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, hippocampal CA1, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, exploratory behavior, social behavior, parental care
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Arvicolinae, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Male, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Parenting, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review