Between the primate and 'reptilian' brain: rodent models demonstrate the role of corticostriatal circuits in decision making
Open accessAbstract
Decision making can be defined as the flexible integration and transformation of information from the external world into action. Recently, the development of novel genetic tools and new behavioral paradigms has made it attractive to study behavior of all kinds in rodents. By some perspectives, rodents are not an acceptable model for the study of decision making due to their simpler behavior often attributed to their less extensive cortical development when compared to non-human primates. We argue that decision making can be approached with a common framework across species. We review insights from comparative anatomy that suggest the expansion of cortical-striatal connectivity is a key development in evolutionary increases in behavioral flexibility. We briefly review studies that establish a role for corticostriatal circuits in integrative decision making. Finally, we provide an overview of a few recent, highly complementary rodent decision making studies using genetic tools, revealing with new cellular and temporal resolution how, when and where information can be integrated and compared in striatal circuits to influence choice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These specialized structures evolutionarily pre-date the cortex.
“These structures evolutionarily pre-date (Lee et al., 2015) the cortex, and hence the cortex may have evolved to work in the context of such specialized mechanisms.”
From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 37
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Albin RL Young AB Penney JB The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends in neurosciences 1989b 12 366 375 2479133
- Gerfen CR Surmeier DJ Modulation of striatal projection systems by dopamine. Annual review of neuroscience 2011 34 441 466 PMC3487690 21469956
- Authors
- Lee, A. M., Tai, L.-H., Zador, A., & Wilbrecht, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilbrecht, L.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 296
- Pages
- 66-74
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4684574
- OpenAlex
- W2088931357
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH087542)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA029150)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- decision-making, corticostriatal circuits, striatum, rodent models, comparative neuroanatomy, cortical development, behavioral flexibility, striatal circuits, genetic instruments, choice behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Corpus Striatum, Decision Making, Neural Pathways, Primates, Species Specificity, Models, Animal, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review