Cited by 316Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsBirth, Development, and HealthSexual Differentiation and Disorders

The gestational foundation of sex differences in development and vulnerability

Open access
DiPietro, J.A., Voegtline, K.M.·2017·Neuroscience

Abstract

Despite long-standing interest in the role of sex on human development, the functional consequences of fetal sex on early development are not well-understood. Here we explore the gestational origins of sex as a moderator of development. In accordance with the focus of this special issue, we examine evidence for a sex differential in vulnerability to prenatal and perinatal risks. Exposures evaluated include those present in the external environment (e.g., lead, pesticides), those introduced by maternal behaviors (e.g., alcohol, opioid use), and those resulting from an adverse intrauterine environment (e.g., preterm birth). We also provide current knowledge on the degree to which sex differences in fetal neurobehavioral development (i.e., cardiac and motor patterns) are present prior to birth. Also considered are contemporaneous and persistent sex of fetus effects on the pregnant woman. Converging evidence confirms that infant and early childhood developmental outcomes of male fetuses exposed to prenatal and perinatal adversities are more highly impaired than those of female fetuses. In certain circumstances, male fetuses are both more frequently exposed to early adversities and more affected by them when exposed than are female fetuses. The mechanisms through which biological sex imparts vulnerability or protection on the developing nervous system are largely unknown. We consider models that implicate variation in maturation, placental functioning, and the neuroendocrine milieu as potential contributors. Many studies use sex as a control variable, some analyze and report main effects for sex, but those that report interaction terms for sex are scarce. As a result, the true scope of sex differences in vulnerability is unknown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.068

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infant biological sex will be used in analyses of infant outcomes as male sex is associated with less optimal outcomes, maternal prenatal depression and impaired neonatal motor behavior, and female sex is associated with prenatal maternal depression and increased anxiety.

    “Infant biological sex will be used in analyses of infant outcomes as male sex is associated with less optimal outcomes [40], maternal prenatal depression and impaired neonatal motor behavior [41], and female sex is associated with prenatal maternal depression and increased anxiety.”

    From The mastery lifestyle intervention to reduce biopsychosocial risks for pregnant Latinas and African Americans and their infants: protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 193 · Cited by 316

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hofer MA 1988 On the nature and function of prenatal behavior Behavior of the Fetus Smotherman W Robinson S 3 18 Caldwell, NJ Telford Press
  2. Temkin O 1991 Soranus’ Gynecology Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press

Authors
DiPietro, J. A., & Voegtline, K. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
DiPietro, J.A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
342
Pages
4-20
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1925727639
Cited by
316
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13
FWCI
14.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NICHD (5R01 HD27592)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
sex differences, fetal sex, prenatal adversity, perinatal risk, preterm birth, maternal alcohol exposure, maternal opioid use, lead exposure, pesticide exposure, placental function, developmental vulnerability
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Characteristics, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review