Cited by 4Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Glutamatergic Projections from the Posterior Complex of the Anterior Olfactory Nucleus to the Amygdala Complexes

Open access
Lu, Ming-Hsuan, Uematsu, Akira, Kiyokawa, Yasushi, Emoto, Kazuo, Takeuchi, Yukari·2023·Neuroscience

Abstract

Social buffering is a phenomenon where stress responses are ameliorated by an affiliative conspecific. Our previous findings suggest that the posterior complex of the anterior olfactory nucleus (AOP) is well positioned to participate in the neural mechanisms underlying social buffering. However, the lack of anatomical information prevents us from further estimating the role of the AOP. Here, we obtained anatomical information regarding the AOP in male rats. In Experiment 1 (n = 5), among 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole-positive cells in the AOP, the proportion of glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (GAD67)-positive cells was 13.8% ± 1.2%. In Experiment 2 (n = 5), among the cells that were labeled by a retrograde tracer injected into the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA), the proportion of GAD67-positive cells was 18.6% ± 0.8%. In Experiment 3 (n = 5), we demonstrated the existence of cells that were labeled by the retrograde tracer injected into the posterior part of the medial amygdala (MeP), mostly into the ventral part of the MeP. In addition, the proportion of GAD67-positive cells among the tracer-labeled cells was 21.7% ± 1.7%. In Experiment 4 (n = 3), the retrograde tracers were injected into the BLA and MeP, mostly into the ventral part of the MeP. The proportion of double-labeled cells among the tracer-labeled cells was 2.1% ± 1.2%. Taken together, these results suggest that the AOP is predominantly composed of glutamatergic neurons. In addition, the AOP sends mutual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2023.04.024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Lu, M.-H., Uematsu, A., Kiyokawa, Y., Emoto, K., & Takeuchi, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • International Research Center for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Kiyokawa, Yasushi
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
521
Pages
102-109
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367673761
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K20299, 20K21458, 21H05176)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
anterior olfactory nucleus, glutamatergic neurons, glutamic acid decarboxylase 67, amygdala, basolateral amygdala, medial amygdala, social buffering, stress response, glutamatergic projections, retrograde tracing
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Male, Neural Pathways, Rats, Olfactory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review